So sprach Cameron Simpson am 2002-05-20 um 10:17:56 +1000 :
> Or you would work around it with a symlink or you don't wan't
> to change $mask. Cheers,
Well, the symlink trick also only works when $mask=.* - see my other
mail. In the default $mask case, mutt doesn't look at the symlink
target.
Al
So sprach Cameron Simpson am 2002-05-20 um 10:17:56 +1000 :
> Or you would work around it with a symlink or you don't wan't
> to change $mask. Cheers,
Well, the symlink trick also only works when $mask=.* - see my other
mail. In the default $mask case, mutt doesn't look at the symlink
target.
Al
On 07:35 19 May 2002, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| So sprach Rocco Rutte am 2002-05-19 um 12:55:56 +0200 :
| > I guess you didn't touch the $mask variable. Maybe mutt does
| > what you'd want it to do but just doesn't display anything
| > because of your $mask.
|
| Oh, yes, you're
So sprach Rocco Rutte am 2002-05-19 um 12:55:56 +0200 :
> I guess you didn't touch the $mask variable. Maybe mutt does
> what you'd want it to do but just doesn't display anything
> because of your $mask.
Oh, yes, you're right! I would have thought that the $mask only
controls what's displayed i
Hi,
* Alexander Skwar [05/19/02 10:34:23 CEST] wrote:
> So I've set my "mailboxes" line to be:
> mailboxes ! +.ML-MUTT-USERS
> However, this doesn't work, because mutt doesn't seem to take mailboxes
> which begin with a Dot (.) (and are hidden because of this).
If mutt didn't accept it, it wou
Hi!
I've got a hard time to make mutt 1.3.99 list files in hidden Maildirs.
Becase I'm also using courier-imap, I've set my procmail recipes to
deliver to ~/Maildir/.ML-MUTT-USERS (in the case of this mailinglist).
However, I'm not accessing my mails via IMAP with mutt, because that's
too slow.