Re: mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-23 Thread Adrian Chung
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 07:44:44PM -0500, Greg Whitlock wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 01:45:10AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > # > # This issue has come up before, and I have some vague memories about a > # patch that would set the file access time to 1 second before the file > # modification

Re: mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Ben Reser
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 01:45:10AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > This is because Mutt doesn't update the folder modification/access times > according to whether the folder still has new mail in it (or not). > > For mbox folders, the N appears in the folder listing if (and only if) > the modifica

Re: mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Greg Whitlock
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 01:45:10AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: # # This issue has come up before, and I have some vague memories about a # patch that would set the file access time to 1 second before the file # modification time when an mbox folder was exited, if it contained new # mails. But I

Re: procmail and mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Nov 2000: > So should this work: > > mailboxes ~/Maildir > mailboxes =DevInfo Yes, that shoudl work. > To further clarify, I should ask... Does mutt actually tell you when > you have mail in other mailboxes? Or only the Maildir? In

Re: mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Marco Ahrendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 14 Nov 2000: > whenever i get new mail this N mark is correctly set by mutt. the > interesting thing is, when i read my mail in the mailbox and i mark > it "new" by hand again (after reading it) the mail gets the N flag fine. > but after changing the

Re: mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Marco Ahrendt
hi all, when discussing the new mail mark problem i have a question too. whenever i get new mail this N mark is correctly set by mutt. the interesting thing is, when i read my mail in the mailbox and i mark it "new" by hand again (after reading it) the mail gets the N flag fine. but after changin

Re: procmail and mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Adrian Chung
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 12:22:16AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Nov 2000: > > or does mutt just not tell you when you have new mail in other > > folders, except for ~/Maildir? > > That's the default. If you have other incoming mail folders, you

Re: procmail and mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Nov 2000: > or does mutt just not tell you when you have new mail in other > folders, except for ~/Maildir? That's the default. If you have other incoming mail folders, you need to tell Mutt about them. This is done with the "mailboxes" command.

procmail and mutt New Mail Notifications.

2000-11-13 Thread Adrian Chung
Hi! I'm using mutt and procmail. It's an older version of procmail that didn't natively support maildirs, and so at the time I'd found a program called safecat, that came with a binary that could be used with procmail to move mail safely into a Maildir. I've noticed that I filter mail successfu