On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:31:48PM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote:
> Pressing a key wakes up mutt, and if it's been more than $mail_check
> seconds it'll go poll all your mailboxes before doing anything
> else. I'd recommend raise mail_check to 120 to poll mailboxes every
> two minutes instead of every
On Monday, 19 October 2009 at 21:16, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 02:04:19PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > Usually mutt works okay using IMAP over GPRS and header/message caching
> > enabled. Sometimes it's slow, when the connection has a long delay and
> > there is n
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 02:04:19PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Usually mutt works okay using IMAP over GPRS and header/message caching
> enabled. Sometimes it's slow, when the connection has a long delay and
> there is no data coming in. I have noticed that a couple of times, when
> using
Am 2009-10-17 14:04:19, schrieb Christian Brabandt:
> > Thats normaly, because mutt load always a bunch of headers per message
> > from the imap and "mailboxes" give your mutt the rest, if you POLL the
> > Mailfolders.
>
> No it is not.
Oh yes... I have backtrace of it. If you let mutt poll
Am 2009-10-16 16:43:35, schrieb Toby Cubitt:
> Offlineimap claims to be extremely fast at synchronising IMAP folders, so
> it might be usable over GPRS.
Even Offline-IMAP must download the messages... Here @me it it will not
help, because I get many VERY big messages with PDF Datasheeits appached
Hi Michelle!
On Fr, 16 Okt 2009, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello Jeffrey,
>
> Am 2009-10-15 22:11:06, schrieb Jeffrey Ratcliffe:
> > Mutt works well with my gmail account via IMAP over a broadband
> > connection. However, I would like to also use it over a GPRS
> > connection, and then, although
Omari Norman wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 04:43:35PM +0100, Toby Cubitt wrote:
Offlineimap claims to be extremely fast at synchronising IMAP folders, so
it might be usable over GPRS. In any case, it can be left to run away in
the background, so it's speed doesn't have much impact on mutt's
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 04:43:35PM +0100, Toby Cubitt wrote:
> Offlineimap claims to be extremely fast at synchronising IMAP folders, so
> it might be usable over GPRS. In any case, it can be left to run away in
> the background, so it's speed doesn't have much impact on mutt's
> responsiveness oth
Toby Cubitt wrote:
Am 2009-10-15 22:11:06, schrieb Jeffrey Ratcliffe:
Mutt works well with my gmail account via IMAP over a broadband
connection. However, I would like to also use it over a GPRS
connection, and then, although mutt starts up OK, and displays the
index at a speed one might expe
Am 2009-10-15 22:11:06, schrieb Jeffrey Ratcliffe:
> Mutt works well with my gmail account via IMAP over a broadband
> connection. However, I would like to also use it over a GPRS
> connection, and then, although mutt starts up OK, and displays the
> index at a speed one might expect, navigating ar
Hello Jeffrey,
Am 2009-10-15 22:11:06, schrieb Jeffrey Ratcliffe:
> Mutt works well with my gmail account via IMAP over a broadband
> connection. However, I would like to also use it over a GPRS
> connection, and then, although mutt starts up OK, and displays the
> index at a speed one might expec
Mutt works well with my gmail account via IMAP over a broadband
connection. However, I would like to also use it over a GPRS
connection, and then, although mutt starts up OK, and displays the
index at a speed one might expect, navigating around the index is too
slow to be useable - i.e. tagging a m
12 matches
Mail list logo
