Using a large mallet, Steve Kennedy whacked out:
> > Message-ID:
> Which was being rejected by lots of MTA's (and thus causing
> bounces).
> Is this mutt ?
no. This evil is done by the MTA (or he might be trying to be clever by
generating a customized message-id in his editor - trivial to d
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:32:07AM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
> > Not me, a list-user ... I just get the crap bounces ...
> Oops, sorry, I misread your message. You are refering to
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?
> Still, what I posted applies. The problem can be remedied by setting
> hostname explici
> Not me, a list-user ... I just get the crap bounces ...
Oops, sorry, I misread your message. You are refering to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?
Still, what I posted applies. The problem can be remedied by setting
hostname explicitly in .muttrc.
Besides, bouncing emails with malformed bad messag
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:21:41AM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
> Steve Kennedy writes:
> > I dont know whether it's mutt or the mta, however someone
> > on the lists here was using mutt and generating a header
> > of the form
> > > Message-ID:
> > Which was being rejected by lots of MTA's (and th
Steve Kennedy writes:
> I dont know whether it's mutt or the mta, however someone
> on the lists here was using mutt and generating a header
> of the form
>
> > Message-ID:
>
> Which was being rejected by lots of MTA's (and thus causing
> bounces).
>
> Is this mutt ?
I guess mutt doesn't kno
I dont know whether it's mutt or the mta, however someone
on the lists here was using mutt and generating a header
of the form
> Message-ID:
Which was being rejected by lots of MTA's (and thus causing
bounces).
Is this mutt ?
Steve
--
NetTek Ltd tel +44-(0)20 7483 1169 fax +44-(0)20 7483
