Re: mime encoding

2000-08-25 Thread David T-G
Scott -- ...and then Scott W. Amory said... % David T-G wrote: % % > .profile or such, and we'll see how it looks on our end. Note the % > "small" above, please :-) % % should what i have in there matter? i tried sending it from two No, not at all; it's just a file that ought to gzip w

Re: mime encoding

2000-08-25 Thread Scott W. Amory
David T-G wrote: > .profile or such, and we'll see how it looks on our end. Note the > "small" above, please :-) should what i have in there matter? i tried sending it from two seperate machines both using bash, both with the same results. nothing real special about the profile and ba

Re: mime encoding

2000-08-25 Thread David T-G
Scott -- ...and then Scott W. Amory said... % hi, % im new to mutt and having some trouble sending mime encoded mail. the Welcome! % headers appear correct but the actual attachment doesn't appear to be That's odd. % encoded. my only guess is that mutt requires a mime decoding progr

mime encoding

2000-08-25 Thread Scott W. Amory
hi, im new to mutt and having some trouble sending mime encoded mail. the headers appear correct but the actual attachment doesn't appear to be encoded. my only guess is that mutt requires a mime decoding program and since i dont have it installed, it just puts the file there. does anyo

MIME-encoding of header lines

1999-06-01 Thread Schröder, Martin
Hi, can mutt be configured to be minimally invasive when it's MIME-encoding header lines? I.e. it should only encoded the words which need encoding and not the whole string after the keyword (even if only the last word needs an encoding). Best regards Martin -- M