On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 07:23:30PM -0500, Corey G. wrote:
> I must be slow or something but here is 6.3.6 from the documentation.
> It only states addresses as alternates. I really do not want to debate
> what the definition of an "alternate" is but it's the same as
> an "alternative" or not the
> Corey G.:
> I would be more than happy to write a better explanation if someone
> really wants me to for the documentation. I only want to make Mutt
> better like everyone else.
sounds great! i vote ``yes'' both for the effort and the offer.
thanks Corey!
--
clemens
Corey G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 23 May 2000:
> I must be slow or something but here is 6.3.6 from the documentation.
> It only states addresses as alternates.
The name is not accurate, and the description isn't either... I would
guess the name is some historical issue or something, al
I must be slow or something but here is 6.3.6 from the documentation.
It only states addresses as alternates. I really do not want to debate
what the definition of an "alternate" is but it's the same as
an "alternative" or not the original. Thus, not the original which would
be referring to your
Corey --
...and then Corey G. said...
% Adding: set alternates = [EMAIL PROTECTED] worked!
Yay :-)
%
% However, I feel that it's not an intuitive option and should probably be
% made more clear with another variable or regular expression. Especially
% since this is not really an alternate but
Hi Corey!
On Mon, 22 May 2000, Corey G. wrote:
> I have unset metoo in the .muttrc but when I reply to a message it still
> persists on including myself if I was in the original "To:". At this
> point I am wondering how Mutt knows what my address really is because
> it's not defined in .muttrc.
Adding: set alternates = [EMAIL PROTECTED] worked!
However, I feel that it's not an intuitive option and should probably be
made more clear with another variable or regular expression. Especially
since this is not really an alternate but the real thing.
__
Corey
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 03:28:
Corey G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 22 May 2000:
> I have unset metoo in the .muttrc but when I reply to a message it still
> persists on including myself if I was in the original "To:". At this
> point I am wondering how Mutt knows what my address really is because
> it's not defined in .
I have unset metoo in the .muttrc but when I reply to a message it still
persists on including myself if I was in the original "To:". At this
point I am wondering how Mutt knows what my address really is because
it's not defined in .muttrc.
Am I missing something easy here?
Thanks,
--
Best Re
