Re: mbox v inbox

2000-01-19 Thread David DeSimone
Bram Shirani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok...I've noticed that mbox and inbox are two separate entities, at > least the way I've got mutt configured. What I would like to do is > get rid of the "inbox" (where new messages are automaticlly sent) and > consolidate them into mbox I suggest you

Re: mbox v inbox

2000-01-19 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-01-18 17:48:10 -0600, Bram Shirani wrote: > It'll also be easier when I change to a directory, then want to > go back to my new mail, whereas before I quit and opened mutt > again, because "inbox" doesn't exist in my list of folders. Try ! as the folder name. It's a shortcut for your in

mbox v inbox

2000-01-19 Thread Bram Shirani
Ok...I've noticed that mbox and inbox are two separate entities, at least the way I've got mutt configured. What I would like to do is get rid of the "inbox" (where new messages are automaticlly sent) and consolidate them into mbox, which will make procmail much easier to use, and I won't have