On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 12:54:34PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
> David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > There is a way, though it's a bit odd. The trick is to make a FIFO (a la
> > "named pipe").
>
> That works, but it doesn't meet the stated requirements, because you'd
> have to remembe
David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is a way, though it's a bit odd. The trick is to make a FIFO (a la
> "named pipe").
That works, but it doesn't meet the stated requirements, because you'd
have to remember to delete the file that was created. He said he was
trying not to have to d
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 11:36:55AM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
> I want to send the output of a unix process (i.e. a text stream) by mail as
> an attached text file _non_ interactively. I loathe making tmp files and
> then deleting them and would like to keep this all in memory using
> variables.
>
Hi
Forgive me if I should address this elsewhere, but the quality of this list
is so high, its just too difficult to resist - ok, I'll stop.
I want to send the output of a unix process (i.e. a text stream) by mail as
an attached text file _non_ interactively. I loathe making tmp files and
then d
