On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 03:16:10PM +0300 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Mikko Hänninen thought:
> Conor Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 17 Oct 2000:
> > Incidentally, does anyone know of a way to cycle through the list of
> > folders with new mail on the "c" command.
>
> You mean, like
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 10:18:31AM +0100, Conor Daly wrote:
> Incidentally, does anyone know of a way to cycle through the list of
> folders with new mail on the "c" command. for instance, my Work-related
> mailboxes are listed before the lists in .muttrc but there's times when
> I'm expecting a
On 2000-10-17 10:18:31 +0100, Conor Daly wrote:
> Incidentally, does anyone know of a way to cycle through the list
> of folders with new mail on the "c" command. for instance, my
> Work-related mailboxes are listed before the lists in .muttrc but
> there's times when I'm expecting a response to
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 10:18:31AM +0100, Conor Daly wrote:
> Incidentally, does anyone know of a way to cycle through
> the list of folders with new mail on the "c" command. for
> instance, my Work-related mailboxes are listed before the
> lists in .muttrc but there's times when I'm expecting a
Conor Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 17 Oct 2000:
> Incidentally, does anyone know of a way to cycle through the list of
> folders with new mail on the "c" command.
You mean, like space does?
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// T
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 04:09:05PM -0700 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Michael Elkins thought:
>
> I'll just add my $0.02US to this and agree with Bruce's example. After
> spending lots of time trying to weed out spammers, I found the most
> effective filter was to simple accept all known ad
