Re: libiconv and mailbox reading speed

2010-11-17 Thread Tim Gray
On Nov 17, 2010 at 02:27 PM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote: Shot in the dark: Especially under MacOS 10.4 I sometimes improved things by: $ tar cjf slow-maildir.tar.bz2 slow-maildir $ mv slow-maildir slow-maildir-bak $ tar xjf slow-maildir.tar.bz2 I'll give it a try. But I really did see a huge

Re: libiconv and mailbox reading speed

2010-11-17 Thread Christian Ebert
* Tim Gray on Monday, November 15, 2010 at 15:40:45 -0500 > On Nov 08, 2010 at 12:49 AM +, Christian Ebert wrote: >> Maybe you have to rebuild the databases now that you're using >> iconv. FWIW, for me the combination with tokyocabinet is >> lightning fast, but I'm still on a pure 32bit MacOS 1

Re: libiconv and mailbox reading speed

2010-11-15 Thread Tim Gray
On Nov 08, 2010 at 12:49 AM +, Christian Ebert wrote: Maybe you have to rebuild the databases now that you're using iconv. FWIW, for me the combination with tokyocabinet is lightning fast, but I'm still on a pure 32bit MacOS 10.5.8. A threaded mailbox with over 75000 messages opens in about 2

Re: libiconv and mailbox reading speed

2010-11-07 Thread Christian Ebert
* Tim Gray on Sunday, November 07, 2010 at 11:04:09 -0500 > In another thread I had a conversation with myself about libiconv and > encoding problems. That is all fixed now. > > There was also thread the other week about header caching and I had > commented that even though I used header caching,

libiconv and mailbox reading speed

2010-11-07 Thread Tim Gray
In another thread I had a conversation with myself about libiconv and encoding problems. That is all fixed now. There was also thread the other week about header caching and I had commented that even though I used header caching, things were slow. I also stated I had upgraded tokyo cabinet a