Re: Key binding problem

On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 01:03:31AM -, Jeffery Small wrote: One thing to note is that on the help page, these assignments are being displayed as the characters A, C, D and ? which could generate confusion since these are not the actual characters which also show up and are bound to other act

Re: Key binding problem

"Kevin J. McCarthy" writes: >On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 07:31:44PM -, Jeffery Small wrote: >>I just tried that, but the debug file reports the same thing shown on the >>command line when the key is pressed. Here are the results: >> >>Keypad / key: Oo: Char = A, Octal = 1101, Decimal = 577 >>

Re: Key binding problem

On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 07:31:44PM -, Jeffery Small wrote: I just tried that, but the debug file reports the same thing shown on the command line when the key is pressed. Here are the results: Keypad / key: Oo: Char = A, Octal = 1101, Decimal = 577 Keypad * key: Oj: Char = C, Octal =

Re: Key binding problem

"Kevin J. McCarthy" writes: >Have you tried running mutt with '-d 1', running , and looking >at ~/.muttdebug0 as you press those keys? That might list the full >sequence of keys mutt is seeing when you press the non-working keys and >give a clue. I just tried that, but the debug file reports th

Re: Key binding problem

On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 07:25:46PM -0700, Jeffery Small wrote: I tried using the what_key function, but it's of little use as it only reports the last character of the escape sequences. Have you tried running mutt with '-d 1', running , and looking at ~/.muttdebug0 as you press those keys? Th

Key binding problem

Ever since upgrading from Xubuntu 20.04 to Xubuntu 22.04.1, I've been having a problem with certain key bindings for some keypad keys. These are properly defined in my .muttrc file and used to work under the previous version of the OS, but now report "Key is not bound," even though when I type "

Re: Key binding problem

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:18:22PM +0200, Veljko wrote: > > Acording to Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition "The Alt modifier (i.e., > Alt-?) is in fact a short way of pressing and releasing Esc before > entering the key combination; hence Esc then f is the same as > Alt-f--UNIX is different from

Re: Key binding problem

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:19:38PM -0500, Tycho Andersen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:53:59PM +0200, Veljko wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > Alt is same as pushed and released Esc, so \ej would give you ALT+j. > > Thanks for the response! > > Unfortunately, I still have the same problem (push

Re: Key binding problem

Hello, On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:19:38PM -0500, Tycho Andersen wrote: > Unfortunately, I still have the same problem (push \ej or push > \252 works, but pressing ALT+j doesn't; pressing esc then j > does, though). I am somewhat familiar with this. I know that in irssi it is the same concept. I h

Re: Key binding problem

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:53:59PM +0200, Veljko wrote: > > Hi! > > Alt is same as pushed and released Esc, so \ej would give you ALT+j. Thanks for the response! Unfortunately, I still have the same problem (push \ej or push \252 works, but pressing ALT+j doesn't; pressing esc then j does, thou

Re: Key binding problem

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:34:30PM -0500, Tycho Andersen wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to bind a key combination to an action. Specifically, I'm > trying to bind ALT+j to something. :exec what-key gives me octal 252 > as the value for this key combo, so I stuck: > > bind index,pager \252 side

Key binding problem

Hi all, I'm trying to bind a key combination to an action. Specifically, I'm trying to bind ALT+j to something. :exec what-key gives me octal 252 as the value for this key combo, so I stuck: bind index,pager \252 sidebar-next in my ~/.muttrc. However, when I source it and press ALT+j, it tells

Re: key binding problem

Hi, On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 Benjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether: [-- snip --] > The macros work great except for when I view an individual attacment > ('v' to get to view-attachments menu, '' to display message > attachment). In this case, the macro is still active since the > attachme

Re: key binding problem

Benjamin D muttered: > > folder-hook . macro index d "~/mail/trashy" > > folder-hook . macro pager d "~/mail/trashy" > > folder-hook trash macro index d "" > > folder-hook trash macro pager d "" > > The macros work great except for when I view an individual attacment > ('v' to get

Re: key binding problem

I have similar macros defined (with the 'y' removed as suggested in a followup). --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Stephen E. Hargrove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i've defined the following macro sequences: > > folder-hook . macro index d "~/mail/trashy" > folder-hook . macro pager d "~/ma

Re: key binding problem

On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 11:11:05PM -0500, Stephen E. Hargrove (dis)graced my inbox with: > i've defined the following macro sequences: > > folder-hook . macro index d "~/mail/trashy" > folder-hook . macro pager d "~/mail/trashy" > folder-hook trash macro index d "" > folder-hook tr

key binding problem

i've defined the following macro sequences: folder-hook . macro index d "~/mail/trashy" folder-hook . macro pager d "~/mail/trashy" folder-hook trash macro index d "" folder-hook trash macro pager d "" the idea is that when i delete a message, it moves that message to the trash f