Re: David Champion 2007-02-05 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/sw/mutt/patch-1.5.11.dgc.markmsg.2
> provides an operation which constructs a macro to
> by Message-ID, using the current message's Message-ID. It's modelled
> on vi's feature to mark lines with "m" and return to t
* Rado S on Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 18:08:10 +0100:
> The idea, not litral mutt code, look up details.
> Works only assuming you don't use "Flag"ing for other purposes,
As I do need flag'ging for other purposes I use the following
workaround with David's (thank you!) patch:
macro pager "\
* Rado S on Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 19:23:47 +0100:
> =- Christian Ebert wrote on Tue 6.Feb'07 at 18:40:24 +0100 -=
>
>>> b) jump last seen:
>>> macro ...
>>
>> "b" is _marked_, jump to "a", unflag "a", everything unflagged.
>
> Argl, I said "not literal", d'oh. ;)
>
> mark -> flag.
=- Christian Ebert wrote on Tue 6.Feb'07 at 18:40:24 +0100 -=
> > b) jump last seen:
> > macro ...
>
> "b" is _marked_, jump to "a", unflag "a", everything unflagged.
Argl, I said "not literal", d'oh. ;)
mark -> flag.
This way b is _flagged_.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort
* Rado S on Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 18:08:10 +0100:
> =- Christian Ebert wrote on Tue 6.Feb'07 at 14:19:16 +0100 -=
>
>>> Then to suffice your requirement you could simply bind the "n"
>>> key to a macro that does the above /and/ executes
>>> .
>>
>> Hm, I'm too dense, I tried, but everyth
=- Christian Ebert wrote on Tue 6.Feb'07 at 14:19:16 +0100 -=
> > Then to suffice your requirement you could simply bind the "n"
> > key to a macro that does the above /and/ executes
> > .
>
> Hm, I'm too dense, I tried, but everything leaves me on the
> message that was marked -- marking the me
* Andreas Herceg on Tuesday, February 06, 2007 at 07:06:05 +0100:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 10:57:54PM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote:
>> * David Champion on Monday, February 05, 2007 at 13:34:26 -0600:
>>> http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/sw/mutt/patch-1.5.11.dgc.markmsg.2
>>> provides an operation wh
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 10:57:54PM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote:
> * David Champion on Monday, February 05, 2007 at 13:34:26 -0600:
> > * On 2007.02.05, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > * "Christian Ebert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/sw/mutt/patch-1.5.11.dgc.ma
* David Champion on Monday, February 05, 2007 at 13:34:26 -0600:
> * On 2007.02.05, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> * "Christian Ebert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For instance if I sort threads and tab jump to the next unread
>> message, sometimes I'd like to go back to the last read, and have
>>
On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 the mental interface of
David Champion told:
[...]
> > Anybody else interested in such a feature?
> > Or could it be done with a macro?
> > Or did I even overlook something?
>
> http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/sw/mutt/patch-1.5.11.dgc.markmsg.2
> provides an operation which con
* On 2007.02.05, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Christian Ebert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One of the very few features I am missing in Mutt is the ability
> to jump to the last read message. This is often available in
> newsreaders.
>
> For instance if I sort threads and tab jump to the n
hello,
One of the very few features I am missing in Mutt is the ability
to jump to the last read message. This is often available in
newsreaders.
For instance if I sort threads and tab jump to the next unread
message, sometimes I'd like to go back to the last read, and have
to search for it first
12 matches
Mail list logo
