On Oct 13 at 18:49, Nicolas Rachinsky spoke:
> Write a shellscript, which outputs the info you want (depending on
> whatever you want) and source it with 'source "pathtoscript"|'.
Ok. Thank you.
-Hanspeter
* Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-13 18:04 +0200]:
> On Oct 13 at 02:20, Bernard Massot spoke:
>
> > hostname = `hostname`
> > Is it what you want ?
>
> No. I want something like this:
>
> if [ `hostname` == host1 ]; then
> set hostname=host2
> fi
>
> It should also affect
On Oct 13 at 02:20, Bernard Massot spoke:
> hostname = `hostname`
> Is it what you want ?
No. I want something like this:
if [ `hostname` == host1 ]; then
set hostname=host2
fi
It should also affect the domain in the envelope when using bounce.
-Hanspeter
* Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-13 00:08 +0200]:
> is there a host-hook in mutt 1.4 or later?
> I would like to set the `hostname' variable depending on the
> hostname.
What about "set hostname=`hostname`"?
Nicolas
Hi,
* Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-10-13 00:08]:
>I would like to set the `hostname' variable depending on the
>hostname.
For your own hostname, `hostname` should do, for the receiver's
hostname, a sendhook should work.
Thorsten
--
If you don't claim your humanity, you will become a
Hello,
is there a host-hook in mutt 1.4 or later?
I would like to set the `hostname' variable depending on the
hostname.
-Hanspeter
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 12:08:18AM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is there a host-hook in mutt 1.4 or later?
> I would like to set the `hostname' variable depending on the
> hostname.
hostname = `hostname`
Is it what you want ?
--
Bernard Massot
msg31756/pgp0
