On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 01:58:04 +0800, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> No, the resulting mailbox can be made to be writable: if you use the
> mutt-notmuch script, just change the below to
> :
Ah, indeed. I'll keep it readonly for me since it actually doesn't do
much to be read/write anyways.
Thanks,
--Ben
On 23Jan2018 03:28, Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă wrote:
On 23-01-2018, at 13h 01'28", Cameron Simpson wrote about "Re: hide identical mails
within the same thread"
On 22Jan2018 15:48, Ben Boeckel wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 20:49:13 +0100, Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă wrote:
>
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:33:16AM -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 15:32:50 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> > Why not just delete the duplicate e-mails?
> >
> > That would seem to be a more efficient way of "always hiding them".
>
> The problem arises when using notmuch to find
On 23-01-2018, at 13h 01'28", Cameron Simpson wrote about "Re: hide identical
mails within the same thread"
> On 22Jan2018 15:48, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 20:49:13 +0100, Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă wrote:
> >>That would still require to h
On 22Jan2018 15:48, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 20:49:13 +0100, Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă wrote:
That would still require to have identical e-mails in more than one
mailbox...
It happens with gmail when an email has more than one label.
And to me locally when I crossfile email an
On 22Jan2018 11:33, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 15:32:50 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
Why not just delete the duplicate e-mails?
That would seem to be a more efficient way of "always hiding them".
The problem arises when using notmuch to find emails across all
mailboxes and cre
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 20:49:13 +0100, Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă wrote:
> That would still require to have identical e-mails in more than one
> mailbox...
It happens with gmail when an email has more than one label.
--Ben
On 22-01-2018, at 16h 37'04", Grant Edwards wrote about "Re: hide identical
mails within the same thread"
> On 2018-01-22, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 15:32:50 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> >> Why not just delete the duplicate e-mails?
&
On 2018-01-22, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 15:32:50 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> Why not just delete the duplicate e-mails?
>>
>> That would seem to be a more efficient way of "always hiding them".
>
> The problem arises when using notmuch to find emails across all
> mailboxes
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 15:32:50 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> Why not just delete the duplicate e-mails?
>
> That would seem to be a more efficient way of "always hiding them".
The problem arises when using notmuch to find emails across all
mailboxes and create a new mailbox with the results. Th
On 2018-01-21, Tim Chase wrote:
> On 2018-01-21 12:18, Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă wrote:
>> You can tag duplicates (defaults are T~=) and do something with it,
>> for example delete them (defaults ;d). You can't hide e-mails in
>> mutt.
>
> Should be able to use the ~= "duplicate message" and invert it
On 21-01-2018, at 12h 18'48", Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă wrote about "Re: hide
identical mails within the same thread"
> [...] You can't hide e-mails in mutt.
I stand corrected! Everyday you learn something new... :-)
Ionel
On 2018-01-21 17:27, Tim Chase wrote:
> folder-hook . 'push ~!='
Sorry, mistyped
folder-hook . 'push !~='
(the adjacency of "~" and "!" on the keyboard didn't help. The "!"
negates the "~=" duplicate functionality).
And as the message says, if later on you do want to see those dupes,
use th
On 2018-01-21 07:01, Tim Chase wrote:
> On 2018-01-21 12:18, Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă wrote:
> > You can tag duplicates (defaults are T~=) and do something with
> > it, for example delete them (defaults ;d). You can't hide e-mails
> > in mutt.
>
> Should be able to use the ~= "duplicate message" an
On 2018-01-21 12:18, Ionel Mugurel Ciobîcă wrote:
> You can tag duplicates (defaults are T~=) and do something with it,
> for example delete them (defaults ;d). You can't hide e-mails in
> mutt.
Should be able to use the ~= "duplicate message" and invert it, then
use that to (by default "l") the
On 22-01-2018, at 03h 33'03", Yubin Ruan wrote about "hide identical mails
within the same thread"
> Is there any configuration for mutt that can hide identical mails within the
> same thread? I indexed all the mails and sometime I re-construct the whole
> thread fr
Is there any configuration for mutt that can hide identical mails within the
same thread? I indexed all the mails and sometime I re-construct the whole
thread from one specific mail. However because some identical mails (with the
same Message-ID, I guess) scatter in several mailbox, within the
17 matches
Mail list logo
