Re: Message header fields displayed in viewer

2009-05-07 Thread Andrey Zhidenkov
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 01:52:26PM +0200, Joost Kremers wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 03:45:40PM +0400, Andrey Zhidenkov wrote: > > When mutt displays a message, it also displays some message header > > fiels ('From:', 'To:' and etc.). But I cannot find out, where I can > > configure what field

Re: Message header fields displayed in viewer

2009-05-07 Thread Joost Kremers
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 03:45:40PM +0400, Andrey Zhidenkov wrote: > When mutt displays a message, it also displays some message header > fiels ('From:', 'To:' and etc.). But I cannot find out, where I can > configure what field will be displayed. For example, I want to see > 'X-Mailer' field if it

Message header fields displayed in viewer

2009-05-07 Thread Andrey Zhidenkov
When mutt displays a message, it also displays some message header fiels ('From:', 'To:' and etc.). But I cannot find out, where I can configure what field will be displayed. For example, I want to see 'X-Mailer' field if it present.

Re: header fields

2001-03-22 Thread Dave Murray
Barry Mitchelson wrote on mutt-users: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 06:49:09AM -0700, Dave Murray wrote: > > Is there a way for me to define a line that will be added to the > > header when a message is sent? > > yes, add the following to your .muttrc : > > my_hdr > > > Is there a way to make it o

Re: header fields

2001-03-22 Thread Barry Mitchelson
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 06:49:09AM -0700, Dave Murray wrote: > Is there a way for me to define a line that will be added to the > header when a message is sent? yes, add the following to your .muttrc : my_hdr > > Is there a way to make it optional (bind it to a key)? um .. not sure. barry

header fields

2001-03-22 Thread Dave Murray
Is there a way for me to define a line that will be added to the header when a message is sent? Is there a way to make it optional (bind it to a key)? I know that I can edit headers, but I'd rather nor resort to that. Thanks, Dave

Re: Strange header fields

2000-03-10 Thread Lars Hecking
> It's impossible for us to say. You'd need to look at the email headers > at your ISP, before they reach your box, to be able to to answer that. > > > If the latter, how can I educate my sendmail? > > rm -rf /usr/{lib,sbin}/sendmail and install a proper MTA instead? ;-) Now, that's a bit ha

Re: Strange header fields

2000-03-10 Thread Lars Hecking
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 10 23:43:44 2000 > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Who is responsible for the garbled "From " and "Return-Path:" headers > (as I don't think these are correct)? Is it GMX or is it my MTA? If > the latter, how can I educate my sendmail? Right now I am usin

Re: Strange header fields

2000-03-10 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 01:24 +0100 11 Mar 2000, Christian R Molls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 10 23:43:44 2000 > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Who is responsible for the garbled "From " and "Return-Path:" headers Nobody, since they're not garbled. The list server is using VE

Re: Strange header fields

2000-03-10 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Christian R Molls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 11 Mar 2000: > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 10 23:43:44 2000 > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Who is responsible for the garbled "From " and "Return-Path:" headers > (as I don't think these are correct)? Is it GMX or is it my MTA? It's

Strange header fields

2000-03-10 Thread Christian R Molls
Hi everybody, I am using GMX (a German freemail service) to collect e-mail from various accounts. Mails that have been collected with GMX have the following header lines (the example is a mail to this list): >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 10 23:43:44 2000 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Who