Re: header cache annoyance

2015-09-20 Thread Christian Ebert
* Ian Zimmerman on Saturday, September 19, 2015 at 17:28:18 -0700 > On 2015-09-20 01:43 +0200, Christian Ebert wrote: >> printf '%s' "/full/path/to/directory" | md5 | xargs rm -r The `-r` should have been omitted of course. > Thanks for the tip, it almost works :P On which system is there a md5 >

Re: header cache annoyance

2015-09-19 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On 2015-09-20 01:43 +0200, Christian Ebert wrote: > printf '%s' "/full/path/to/directory" | md5 | xargs rm -r Thanks for the tip, it almost works :P On which system is there a md5 program? Here: [9+0]~$ folder=Mail/inbox [10+0]~$ printf '%s' `readlink -f $folder` | md5sum 6937aaf0469360e061c78

Re: header cache annoyance

2015-09-19 Thread Christian Ebert
* Ian Zimmerman on Friday, September 18, 2015 at 20:40:01 -0700 > Another annoying thing about the header cache is the hashed file > names. It means when I delete/archive a folder (such as after > unsubscribing from a list) I apparently have no way of knowing which > file to delete from the header

Re: header cache annoyance [Was: save in current folder?]

2015-09-19 Thread Gregor Zattler
Hi Ian, mutt users, * Ian Zimmerman [18. Sep. 2015]: > On 2015-09-19 12:21 +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: > Yeah. Another annoying thing about the header cache is the hashed file > names. It means when I delete/archive a folder (such as after > unsubscribing from a list) I apparently have no way

header cache annoyance [Was: save in current folder?]

2015-09-18 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On 2015-09-19 12:21 +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: > >Is it possible (and safe) to set the record variable, or the Fcc > >header, to the folder from where I send the mail? > > I believe so. There's no reason you can't save a copy in the source > folder - I do this myself, though in a more roundabo