Re: GPG test

2011-06-12 Thread Chris Brennan
OK! I got creative and pretty much re-write my ~/.mutt/gpg.rc, ct now contains the following: # vim: syntax=muttrc # -*-muttrc-*- # These settings are from /usr/share/doc/mutt-1.5.21-r1/samples/gpg.rc # set pgp_sign_as=0xD5B20C0C #set pgp_sign_as=0x6748EE46C7D11FB8DA89E4AEECD9A84D5B20C0C #set pg

Re: gpg test

2000-07-18 Thread Mrinal Kalakrishnan
Hi, Dale Morris typed: > I've been fooling around with gpg and having some trouble with it. Can > anyone tell me if this message is showing up as properly signed? I may > have revoked this key, I'm not sure. Yup, it's properly signed: [-- PGP output follows (current time: Tue Jul 18 16:06:23 2

Re: gpg test

2000-07-18 Thread David T-G
Dale -- ...and then Dale Morris said... % I've been fooling around with gpg and having some trouble with it. Can % anyone tell me if this message is showing up as properly signed? I may Sure looks like it to me. % have revoked this key, I'm not sure. Doesn't look like it, but I also don't kn

gpg test

2000-07-18 Thread Dale Morris
I've been fooling around with gpg and having some trouble with it. Can anyone tell me if this message is showing up as properly signed? I may have revoked this key, I'm not sure. thanks PGP signature