Re: gpg integration

2013-01-23 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
Florian Lohoff wrote: > i am a long time mutt and gpg user but still the gpg integration is kind > of lacking. > > - I'd like to define recipients including their gpg key id to use. > - Better - Mutt/Procmail could help by looking out for signed mails > which tell the rec

Re: gpg integration

2013-01-23 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Florian Lohoff: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:43:28AM -0700, s. keeling wrote: > > > > That makes no sense to me. If you're sending to multiple recipients, > > which key is common to them all? You'd need to send a separate > > There is no limit on the number of recipients that i am

Re: gpg integration

2013-01-23 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 07:19:23PM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote: > Please try: > > echo This is my content >test > gpg -r Bob -r Alice -e test > > You will get a test.gpg which well be readable by Bob and Alices key. > > mutt supports this today - you can add multiple recipients and s

Re: gpg integration

2013-01-23 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:43:28AM -0700, s. keeling wrote: > Incoming from Florian Lohoff: > > > > i am a long time mutt and gpg user but still the gpg integration is > > kind of lacking. > > So says you. :-) > > > - I'd like to define recipients inc

Re: gpg integration

2013-01-23 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Florian Lohoff: > > i am a long time mutt and gpg user but still the gpg integration is > kind of lacking. So says you. :-) > - I'd like to define recipients including their gpg key id to use. That makes no sense to me. If you're sending to multiple re

gpg integration

2013-01-23 Thread Florian Lohoff
Hi, i am a long time mutt and gpg user but still the gpg integration is kind of lacking. - I'd like to define recipients including their gpg key id to use. - Better - Mutt/Procmail could help by looking out for signed mails which tell the recipient has a mail setup which is gpg enabled