Hello,
Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 25
Feb 2000:
> this works, but q. is why does not work "generic" ?
I just noticed that when you do "help" in the index, you get a listing
of "generic bindings" after the "index bindings". But for the pager,
you don't get
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 10:48:44PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 24
>Feb 2000:
> > bind generic '?' search-opposite
> > bind generic '' help
> >
> > but this does not work in pager.
> >
> > generic does not match pager section
Mikko Hänninen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 24
>Feb 2000:
>
> It should match, provided that there's no specific binding for the keys
> in that map (=the context, index/pager/etc.). Ie. the map-specific
> bindings always over
Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 24
Feb 2000:
> bind generic '?' search-opposite
> bind generic '' help
>
> but this does not work in pager.
>
> generic does not match pager section ?
It should match, provided that there's no specific binding for the keys
in t
Hi,
I have defined
#opposite search
bind generic '?' search-opposite
#redefine help
bind generic '' help
but this does not work in pager.
generic does not match pager section ?
--
Keso
don't worry about glory
