Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000:
> ... and not supported by MTAs different from sendmail, such as
> postfix or qmail, right?
Right for qmail too.
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer
Thomas Roessler proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> On 2000-10-24 15:21:12 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > RFC 2076 - Common Internet Message Headers
> That's a summary of existing usage
Yes - and it documents the common usages of the Priority: header.
> > RFC 2524 - EMSD (Efficient
Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to mark a message as Important or Urgent, so that the
> > receiver notices this.
> > I know this is common for other clients (Importance: or X-Priority:).
> > It is of course possible to add this manually, but shouldn't this be an
> > standard mail client
> > Some MUAs (elm, I think) provide support for a Precedence:
> > header, but this header does something very different: it allows
> > to tweak the priority of messages (= sort order) in sendmail's
> > queue. The algorithm behind that is described in the Sendmail
> > Installation and Operat
On 2000-10-24 11:10:28 +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
> Some MUAs (elm, I think) provide support for a Precedence:
> header, but this header does something very different: it allows
> to tweak the priority of messages (= sort order) in sendmail's
> queue. The algorithm behind that is described in
> Is it possible to mark a message as Important or Urgent, so that the
> receiver notices this.
> I know this is common for other clients (Importance: or X-Priority:).
> It is of course possible to add this manually, but shouldn't this be an
> standard mail client feature? Or this not depreciated
On 2000-10-24 15:21:12 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> RFC 2076 - Common Internet Message Headers
That's a summary of existing usage
> RFC 2524 - EMSD (Efficient Mail Submission and Delivery)
Don't know that one. Does it define a priority mechanism?
--
Thomas Roessler
Thomas Roessler proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> On 2000-10-24 10:03:13 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > This might be better off as an editor macro, IMHO.
> I could imagine a nice function in mutt.
> However, does anyone have an RFC for this which we could implement?
Hi - try these
On 2000-10-24 10:03:13 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> This might be better off as an editor macro, IMHO.
I could imagine a nice function in mutt.
However, does anyone have an RFC for this which we could implement?
--
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bruce J.A. Nourish proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> I've been wanting to ask this for a while... I guess its nothing that can't
> be done with my_hdr, E on the compose menu (or $edit_headers) and a few
> scoring rules. But it would be nice to press (say) I on the compose menu
> which would bring
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 08:57:04PM +0200, Wouter Verheijen wrote:
> hi,
>
> Is it possible to mark a message as Important or Urgent, so that the
> receiver notices this.
> I know this is common for other clients (Importance: or X-Priority:).
> It is of course possible to add this manually, but sh
hi,
Is it possible to mark a message as Important or Urgent, so that the
receiver notices this.
I know this is common for other clients (Importance: or X-Priority:).
It is of course possible to add this manually, but shouldn't this be an
standard mail client feature? Or this not depreciated?
--
12 matches
Mail list logo
