Re: editors and paragraphs

2002-03-19 Thread MuttER
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-19-02 18:40]: > * Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 09:27]: > > * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-13 17:40:27 +0100]: > > > Which editors parse for dates? examples? (anyone?) > > Some people consider emacs to be an editor. > > oh - that

Re: editors and paragraphs

2002-03-14 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 09:21:49AM +, Dave Pearson wrote: > * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-13 17:40:27 +0100]: > > > * MuttER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020313 14:17]: > > > > > Many editors would have difficulty recognizing and parsing your date > > > format. > > > > Which editors pa

Re: editors and paragraphs

2002-03-14 Thread Dave Pearson
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 12:09:19 +0100]: > * Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 09:27]: > > > , > > | ELISP> (parse-time-string "020313 14:17") > > | (0 17 14 nil nil nil nil nil nil) > > ` > > looks like the parsing can still be enhanced. *ehem* How sh

Re: editors and paragraphs

2002-03-14 Thread Sven Guckes
* Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 09:27]: > * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-13 17:40:27 +0100]: > > Which editors parse for dates? examples? (anyone?) > Some people consider emacs to be an editor. oh - that one. > , > | *** Welcome to IELM *** Type (describe-mode)

Re: editors and paragraphs

2002-03-14 Thread Dave Pearson
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-13 17:40:27 +0100]: > * MuttER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020313 14:17]: > > > Many editors would have difficulty recognizing and parsing your date > > format. > > Which editors parse for dates? examples? (anyone?) Some people consider emacs to be an edit

Re: editors and paragraphs

2002-03-13 Thread Sven Guckes
* MuttER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020313 14:17]: > My name is in the header and the sig. I receive very little > uce/spam and have no filters expressly for rejecting same. this will change over time. dont worry. > I do not know that I have ever read a book without paragraphs. > BUT, I have read ma