Re: crypt-hook: truncated list of gpg recipients passed to pgpewrap

2016-07-28 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:12:52AM +0200, Steve Schmerler wrote: > On Jul 27 19:19 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > Thanks! I'll give gpgme a spin. I didn't find that much documentation, > though. I only need to set > > crypt_use_gpgme > crypt_use_pka You only really need to set crypt_u

Re: crypt-hook: truncated list of gpg recipients passed to pgpewrap

2016-07-28 Thread Steve Schmerler
On Jul 27 19:19 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > I think I see the problem. Mutt is using a fixed buffer of size 1024 > when expanding the %r parameter. I think when the system was designed, > no one anticipated expanding 50+ keys in a single gpg invocation. :-) Yes, I was suspecting something

Re: crypt-hook: truncated list of gpg recipients passed to pgpewrap

2016-07-27 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 03:43:41PM +0200, Steve Schmerler wrote: > * stops at the third[**] key 74464897317CDA88 (length 16) and > * passes a truncated version 74464897317CDA (length 14) to pgpewrap > > which then gives me a "gpg: skipped: Invalid user ID". The related pgp > setting is > > se

crypt-hook: truncated list of gpg recipients passed to pgpewrap

2016-07-26 Thread Steve Schmerler
Hi all The following is related to [1], i.e. use multiple crypt-hook commands. I'm using something like this[*] crypt-hook mailing.l...@company.com EX9B197029581FAC crypt-hook mailing.l...@company.com 4C95T7E7F627637D crypt-hook mailing.l...@company.com 74464897317CDA88 crypt-hook