Re: combined reply & list-reply

2000-07-11 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Marianne Albin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 11 Jul 2000: > If you read the README.UPGRADE file, you will find that the "subscribe" > option should now be denoted as "lists" instead. Even so, I've never gotten "list-reply" to do a regular reply if I try to do the list-reply function on a mes

Re: combined reply & list-reply

2000-07-11 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Marianne Albin proclaimed on mutt-users that: >If you read the README.UPGRADE file, you will find that the "subscribe" >option should now be denoted as "lists" instead. You've got it devant-derriere ;) Lists was the old one - you'll have to use "subscribe" now ... > 2. Mailing list behaviour

Re: combined reply & list-reply

2000-07-11 Thread Marianne Albin
If you read the README.UPGRADE file, you will find that the "subscribe" option should now be denoted as "lists" instead. - Original Message - From: "Jeremy M. Dolan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, July 10, 2000 2:19 pm Subject: combined reply &

combined reply & list-reply

2000-07-11 Thread Jeremy M. Dolan
Is there some way to have the 'r' key in mutt 1.2 reply as a list-reply if the address matches lists or subscribe, and do a normal reply if it doesnt? This is how the 1.0 series worked for me, and now in 1.2 I keep sending replies to single people and not noticing it until days later (I've already