Re: char sets (was "Re: mail-followup-to standard...." though it shouldn't have been)

2001-12-05 Thread David T-G
Michael, et al -- ...and then Michael Tatge said... % David T-G muttered: % > % > :set ?charset % > charset="iso-8859-1" % > % > so I should think that it would be fine. Does anyone have any idea what % > might be up? % % What are your LC settings? % % Mine are: % LANG=en_US % LANGUAGE=e

Re: char sets (was "Re: mail-followup-to standard...." though it shouldn't have been)

2001-12-05 Thread Michael Tatge
David T-G muttered: > % | % René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > Interesting... Your accented e showed up as backslash-three-five-one > in the pager > My charset value is > > :set ?charset > charset="iso-8859-1" > > so I should think that it would be fine. Does anyon

Re: char sets (was "Re: mail-followup-to standard...." though it shouldn't have been)

2001-12-05 Thread David T-G
Rene -- ...and then Ren? Clerc said... % * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-12-2001 03:18]: % % | :set ?charset % | charset="iso-8859-1" % % So is mine. Hokay; that makes sense. % % | so I should think that it would be fine. Does anyone have any idea what % | might be up? % % Except

Re: char sets (was "Re: mail-followup-to standard...." though it shouldn't have been)

2001-12-05 Thread René Clerc
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-12-2001 03:18]: | My charset value is | | :set ?charset | charset="iso-8859-1" So is mine. | so I should think that it would be fine. Does anyone have any idea what | might be up? Except for this incredibly long list of patches, most values are the sam

char sets (was "Re: mail-followup-to standard...." though it shouldn't have been)

2001-12-04 Thread David T-G
Rene, et al -- ...and then Ren? Clerc said... % * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-12-2001 23:41]: % % | Rene -- % | % | ...and then Ren? Clerc said... ... % | % -- % | % René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) % % Hmm... you still seem to find three ways to spell my name ;) I