On 15.Nov 2013, 01:18, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
> * Jonas Petong [13. Nov. 2013]:
> > On 13.Nov 2013, 13:01, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 18:50:44 +0100, Jonas Petong wrote:
> >>> Cameron, you were right, the message id's are the same. From the matter
> >>
Hi Jonas,
* Jonas Petong [13. Nov. 2013]:
> On 13.Nov 2013, 13:01, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 18:50:44 +0100, Jonas Petong wrote:
>>> Cameron, you were right, the message id's are the same. From the matter of
>>> fact
>>> that limiting my Inbox by ~= did not work l
On 14.Nov 2013, 10:24, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 13.Nov 2013, 13:01, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> > (Note that as I understand this limit only works when the sort order is
> > > "thread". That is, with no limit applied you should be seeing the
> > > duplicate messages marked with an "=" char
Cameron
Many thanks indeed for taking the time to write out a detailed explanation!
Best Regards
Maurice
On 13/11/2013, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 13Nov2013 20:20, Maurice McCarthy wrote:
>> Please excuse a numpty interrupting, but could an old procmail recipe
>> be adapted for use here. What
On 13.Nov 2013, 13:01, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> (Note that as I understand this limit only works when the sort order is
> > "thread". That is, with no limit applied you should be seeing the
> > duplicate messages marked with an "=" character your mailbox index
> >
On 13Nov2013 20:20, Maurice McCarthy wrote:
> Please excuse a numpty interrupting, but could an old procmail recipe
> be adapted for use here. What I've got I don't understand and it was
> poached from somewhere or other
>
> # Get rid of duplicates
> :0 Whc: .msgid.lock
> | formail -D 16384 .msgi
Please excuse a numpty interrupting, but could an old procmail recipe
be adapted for use here. What I've got I don't understand and it was
poached from somewhere or other
# Get rid of duplicates
:0 Whc: .msgid.lock
| formail -D 16384 .msgid.cache
:0 a
/dev/null
Regards
Maurice
On 13.Nov 2013, 13:01, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 18:50:44 +0100, Jonas Petong wrote:
> > Cameron, you were right, the message id's are the same. From the matter of
> > fact
> > that limiting my Inbox by ~= did not work led me to the conclusion that
> > their
> > ID
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 18:50:44 +0100, Jonas Petong wrote:
> Cameron, you were right, the message id's are the same. From the matter of
> fact
> that limiting my Inbox by ~= did not work led me to the conclusion that their
> IDs have been different. Seems like you've teached me wrong so.
What ha
On 13.Nov 2013, 14:11, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 13Nov2013 09:06, Chris Down wrote:
> > On 2013-11-12 19:22:24 +0100, Jonas Petong wrote:
> > > Today I accidentally copied my mails into the same folder where they had
> > > been
> > > stored before (evil keybinding!!!) and now I'm faced with abo
On 13.Nov 2013, 00:48, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 07:22:24PM +0100, Jonas Petong wrote:
> > Today I accidentally copied my mails into the same folder where they had
> > been
> > stored before (evil keybinding!!!) and now I'm faced with about a 1000
> > copies
> > within my inbox.
On 13Nov2013 09:06, Chris Down wrote:
> On 2013-11-12 19:22:24 +0100, Jonas Petong wrote:
> > Today I accidentally copied my mails into the same folder where they had
> > been
> > stored before (evil keybinding!!!) and now I'm faced with about a 1000
> > copies
> > within my inbox. Since those d
On 2013-11-12 19:22:24 +0100, Jonas Petong wrote:
> Today I accidentally copied my mails into the same folder where they had been
> stored before (evil keybinding!!!) and now I'm faced with about a 1000 copies
> within my inbox. Since those duplicates do not have a unique mail-id, it's
> hopeless t
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 07:22:24PM +0100, Jonas Petong wrote:
> Today I accidentally copied my mails into the same folder where they had been
> stored before (evil keybinding!!!) and now I'm faced with about a 1000 copies
> within my inbox. Since those duplicates do not have a unique mail-id, it's
Today I accidentally copied my mails into the same folder where they had been
stored before (evil keybinding!!!) and now I'm faced with about a 1000 copies
within my inbox. Since those duplicates do not have a unique mail-id, it's
hopeless to filter them with mutts integrated duplicate limiting pat
15 matches
Mail list logo
