Hi,
> The do it... :) In mutt, you can even set $signature to a pipe, i.e.
> a script that gets the signature as argument and prints it with BOM:
>
> set signature="script.sh signature|"
That's what I did now, wrote a script strip-bom.pl which removes the BOM
from the beginning of the signatur
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 05:26:55PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> > As to where it comes from, the character is in the signature file. I
> > wouldn't expect the MUA to remove characters from the signature file.
>
> Not in general, but this one is special. ;-)
Not from mutt's view.
> > Why is it
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 08:11:58AM -0600, lee wrote:
> Is it possible to use this character in the body of a mail? I'm not
> seeing a special character in the signature.
Yes, it's just that this one has zero width and there mutt ignores
it (as it does for 0x200b).
Rocco
Hi,
> Is it possible to use this character in the body of a mail? I'm not
> seeing a special character in the signature.
Why should it not be? At least it corrupts the correct signature
coloring in my mutt. Haven't tried this with other mail clients yet.
> As to where it comes from, the characte
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 03:52:10PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
>
> 24 Alexander Dahl, Staff Engineer
>
> This is the same signature you should see below and you should also find
> this special character in it.
Is it possible to use this character in the body of a mail? I'm not
seeing a specia
Hi there,
up to today I had just one signature file in the plain old place
~/.signature which I edited on the system I used mutt. For my other mail
clients I have a bunch of different signature files in a VCS to use the
same files with different clients (actually several instances of Mozilla
Thund
