* On 22 Jul 2010, rog...@sdf.org wrote:
> > spam "X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=([^ ]+)" "SA:%1"
> > # Add more patterns as needed for other spam engines you use.
>
> So, I'm experimenting with Bogofilter. Bogofilter, doesn't seem to
> be catching much at all and has to be trained -- so I've been m
Here's what I've simply settled on:
# Remap S to move spam to the spam folder
macro index S "unset wait_key\nbogofilter
-s\nset wait_key\ns=.Spam\n"
macro pager S "unset wait_key\nbogofilter
-s\nset wait_key\ns=.Spam\n"
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:35:43AM -0500, David Champion wrote:
>* On 21 Jul 2010, Roger wrote:
>> >> Since I'm always saving/moving email to $HOME/.maildir/.Spam... you
>> >> would think Mutt would catch-on after the 10th email. ;-)
>> >
>> >I attach the following macros to the z key in my .muttr
* On 21 Jul 2010, Roger wrote:
> >> Since I'm always saving/moving email to $HOME/.maildir/.Spam... you
> >> would think Mutt would catch-on after the 10th email. ;-)
> >
> >I attach the following macros to the z key in my .muttrc
> >
> > macro index z "s=mutt/spam\n" "move message to spam"
> > ma
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:12:34PM +0100, Steve Searle wrote:
>Around 07:56pm on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 (UK time), Roger scrawled:
>
>> Since I'm always saving/moving email to $HOME/.maildir/.Spam... you
>> would think Mutt would catch-on after the 10th email. ;-)
>
>I attach the following macros
Around 07:56pm on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 (UK time), Roger scrawled:
> Since I'm always saving/moving email to $HOME/.maildir/.Spam... you
> would think Mutt would catch-on after the 10th email. ;-)
I attach the following macros to the z key in my .muttrc
macro index z "s=mutt/spam\n" "move me
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 06:50:12PM +0200, Rado S wrote:
>=- Christoph Kluenter wrote on Wed 21.Jul'10 at 10:30:34 +0200 -=
>
>> Thank you very much. save-hooks is exactly what I want.
>
>There are some vars controlling save-location, if you want to make
>it constant.
force_name & save_name?
* Roger [07-21-10 14:57]:
>
> You do have a valid point with Mutt being *always* wrong, to the point it just
> makes up some folder name that doesn't even exist from the idea of the
> sender's
> email address!
mutt can only be wrong as it is configured (or not) to be.
> A likely more appropria
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:36:54AM +0200, Christoph Kluenter wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>when I press "s" to save a mail to another folder, mutt suggest the foldername.
>But mutt is mostly always wrong :-)
>So I thought it would be nice if I could write my own script which would parse
>the mail
>and sugges
=- Christoph Kluenter wrote on Wed 21.Jul'10 at 10:30:34 +0200 -=
> Thank you very much. save-hooks is exactly what I want.
There are some vars controlling save-location, if you want to make
it constant.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least t
* Am Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:02:08AM +0200 , schrieb Joost Kremers:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:36:54AM +0200, Christoph Kluenter wrote:
> > when I press "s" to save a mail to another folder, mutt suggest the
> > foldername.
> > But mutt is mostly always wrong :-)
> > So I thought it would be nic
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:36:54AM +0200, Christoph Kluenter wrote:
> when I press "s" to save a mail to another folder, mutt suggest the
> foldername.
> But mutt is mostly always wrong :-)
> So I thought it would be nice if I could write my own script which would
> parse the mail
> and suggest a
Hi all,
when I press "s" to save a mail to another folder, mutt suggest the foldername.
But mutt is mostly always wrong :-)
So I thought it would be nice if I could write my own script which would parse
the mail
and suggest a folder. Is something like this possible or feasable ?
Alternatively I w
13 matches
Mail list logo
