On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 05:33:15AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> ARGH. It really should have been %?M?+& ?
> % starts the sequence
> ? starts the 'if'
> M is the regular % token to use for the condition
> ? prefaces the non-zero part
> + is what to print if the condition (%M) is non-zero
> & pre
Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 05:09:51AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > Jeremy Blosser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > > > You can use %M in the index_format to show the number of messages in a
> > > > > collpased thread. You can use something like %?M?+& to ge
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 05:09:51AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Jeremy Blosser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > > You can use %M in the index_format to show the number of messages in a
> > > > collpased thread. You can use something like %?M?+& to get just a + sign
> > > > in your index listing
Jeremy Blosser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > You can use %M in the index_format to show the number of messages in a
> > > collpased thread. You can use something like %?M?+& to get just a + sign
> > > in your index listing for collapsed threads. See the help for index_format
> > > for more in
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 04:40:27AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> V collapse-allcollapse/uncollapse all threads
> v collapse-thread collapse/uncollapse current thread
No, actually now that I look at it again, I see uncollapse. Problem was, I
was looking for a hook
Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 03:56:16AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > collapse-all and collapse-thread are actually toggles -- the names are
> > sort of misnomers.
>
> You know, after I sent that, I wondered if, like slrn, they might be
> toggles, but didn't h
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 03:56:16AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > I'm rather a bit used to slrn, I guess, but I noticed after going through
> > the help screen 5 times that you can collapse a thread, or collapse ALL
> > threads, but there is no "expand-all-
Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I'm rather a bit used to slrn, I guess, but I noticed after going through
> the help screen 5 times that you can collapse a thread, or collapse ALL
> threads, but there is no "expand-all-threads" or "expand-thread" short of
collapse-all and collapse-thread a
Just a quick comment/question re: threads in mutt
I'm rather a bit used to slrn, I guess, but I noticed after going through
the help screen 5 times that you can collapse a thread, or collapse ALL
threads, but there is no "expand-all-threads" or "expand-thread" short of
going to each thread and op
