On 26.03.08 17:19:41, Vincent van Leeuwen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 01:41:34PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there a convenient way to store multiple attachements into the same
> > path? If I tag all of them and then use ;+s mutt asks me for the
> > filename/path for each
> > is there a convenient way to store multiple attachements into the same
> > path? If I tag all of them and then use ;+s mutt asks me for the
> > filename/path for each one, but I'd like to give just a path and mutt
> > should use the filenames as are in the mail.
> >
> > Andreas
> If you tag m
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 01:41:34PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a convenient way to store multiple attachements into the same
> path? If I tag all of them and then use ;+s mutt asks me for the
> filename/path for each one, but I'd like to give just a path and mutt
> should use
Hi,
is there a convenient way to store multiple attachements into the same
path? If I tag all of them and then use ;+s mutt asks me for the
filename/path for each one, but I'd like to give just a path and mutt
should use the filenames as are in the mail.
Andreas
--
You have a reputation for bei