Re: Solaris segfaults on replying with mutt 1.0pre3i

1999-09-30 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-10-01 00:14:59 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This mail is a messages which has been converted by an in-house > utility from a Lotus Notes database document, and I suspect that > some headers are missing / incorrect. Actually, the message-id header was missing. Here's a quick fix for

Re: Solaris segfaults on replying with mutt 1.0pre3i

1999-09-30 Thread rutger
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 12:14:04PM -0500, MSCS Technician wrote: > > Hello, > >I upgraded our Solaris 7 machine from mutt 0.95.4i to mutt 1.0pre3i > following the recent security announcement. > >We've noticed that when one of our users sends a message from Solaris > 7's dtmail, I can r

Re: Solaris segfaults on replying with mutt 1.0pre3i

1999-09-30 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
I'd be willing to look at a copy, or if you can just send it to mutt-dev, that would be even better. Perhaps the best thing to do would be to make a mailbox with just that message and gzip it to avoid any changes during transport, and send it as an attachement. Also, it would be helpful to see a

Solaris segfaults on replying with mutt 1.0pre3i

1999-09-30 Thread MSCS Technician
Hello, I upgraded our Solaris 7 machine from mutt 0.95.4i to mutt 1.0pre3i following the recent security announcement. We've noticed that when one of our users sends a message from Solaris 7's dtmail, I can read the message in mutt, but attempts to 'r'eply wind up in a mutt segfault.