On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 07:51:08AM +0100, Eyolf Østrem wrote:
> On 04.03.2008 (15:34), Chris Bannister wrote:
> > So in your .muttrc do you have something like:
> >
> > set editor ="vim -u mutt-vimrc"
> >
> > or ...?
> >
> > The -u option skips all other initialisation, which would mean
> >
On 04.03.2008 (15:34), Chris Bannister wrote:
> So in your .muttrc do you have something like:
>
> set editor ="vim -u mutt-vimrc"
>
> or ...?
>
> The -u option skips all other initialisation, which would mean
> options like 'textwidth= ' would be lost.
Yes, something like that. I've been
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 02:51:32PM +0100, Eyolf Østrem wrote:
>
>
> On 27.02.2008 (17:37), Breen Mullins wrote:
> > Since my suggested mapping
> > map ,ds :.,/^-- $/-1dO
> >
> > only makes sense if I'm editing a mail, I pulled it from my .vimrc
> > and dropped it into ~/.vim/after/syntax/mail.vi
On 27.02.2008 (17:37), Breen Mullins wrote:
> Since my suggested mapping
> map ,ds :.,/^-- $/-1dO
>
> only makes sense if I'm editing a mail, I pulled it from my .vimrc
> and dropped it into ~/.vim/after/syntax/mail.vim .
For what it's worth, I have the following in my mutt-vimrc file:
imap ff
* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-18 14:22 -0600]:
Comma repeats the last f/t/F/T operation in the opposite direction. I
don't know why you'd start macros with it either. :)
Well, that's a good point even if I rarely use the reverse-sense search.
Since my suggested mapping
ma
On 02/20/08, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2008-02-20, Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 02/18/08, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> > > A macro to remove all two-line things would be something like this:
> > >
> > > :%s/\n\n/\r/
> > >
> > > You can add it to your $editor setting (+%s/\n\n/\r/) or you
On 2008-02-20, Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02/18/08, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> > A macro to remove all two-line things would be something like this:
> >
> > :%s/\n\n/\r/
> >
> > You can add it to your $editor setting (+%s/\n\n/\r/) or you can make
> > a key mapping out of it (map ,oe
On 02/18/08, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> A macro to remove all two-line things would be something like this:
>
> :%s/\n\n/\r/
>
> You can add it to your $editor setting (+%s/\n\n/\r/) or you can make
> a key mapping out of it (map ,oe :%s/\n\n/\r/), whichever you
> prefer.
>
What I would like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, February 18 at 11:48 AM, quoth Breen Mullins:
>> For others who may want to try this, I had to make some changes to
>> get it to work.
>
> You changed my definition. I actually do type comma-d-s to trim the
> message. (All of my macros te
* Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-18 14:33 -0500]:
Wow, that is really slick.
But not original to me - I snarfed something similar a long time ago...
For others who may want to try this, I had to make some changes to get
it to work.
You changed my definition. I actually do type comma-d
On 02/18/08, Breen Mullins wrote:
> * Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-18 13:08 -0500]:
>
>> When replying to an email that you sent earlier, how would you go about
>> removing the previous signature?
>
> I use vim as my editor - I have a macro defined in vimrc
>
> map ,ds :.,/^-- $/-1dO
>
> (d
On 18 Feb 2008 19:05 +, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Kjorling):
> Run a message through this awk script before passing it to your
> editor. (Set $editor to a wrapper script.)
Sorry, I missed one pretty important detail. This is how you invoke
it:
awk -f awkfile OUTFILE=$outfname $infname
--
On 18 Feb 2008 13:08 -0500, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph):
> When replying to an email that you sent earlier, how would you go about
> removing the previous signature?
Run a message through this awk script before passing it to your
editor. (Set $editor to a wrapper script.)
** cut **
{if ($0 ~ /^
* Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-18 13:08 -0500]:
When replying to an email that you sent earlier, how would you go about
removing the previous signature?
I use vim as my editor - I have a macro defined in vimrc
map ,ds :.,/^-- $/-1dO
(ds for delete-to-sigdashes). It's not automatic, b
When replying to an email that you sent earlier, how would you go about
removing the previous signature?
Some times you communicate to someone and end up with a lot of copies of
old signatures. Thunderbird at least some of the time detects that your
signature is already there and removes it for yo
15 matches
Mail list logo
