On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 01:34:10AM +0200, Christoph Bugel wrote:
>some time to figure out. and I wonder if everybody else with an out-of-the-box
>linux distro / dialup connection can use mutt without all this hassle...
>(me = slackware user)
>
It might not be OOTB, but if you're the sysadmin o
I use `my_hdr', but `set from' seems to be more straightforward.. I also think
it is better to change the From: field, and not the reply-to: field. (some
people/mailers seem to ignore that). The reply-to method is a work-around. I
had to use that work-around for some time, because my sendmail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] muttered:
> I love using mutt, but I cannot figure out how to set it to include a
> reply-to address for my outgoing mail. I am on a standalone computer
> and use my non-existant hostname, but would like a reply-to address
> to be listed so people can reply to the right address.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> Hello.. hopefully this gets to someone who can help me. I love using
> mutt, but I cannot figure out how to set it to include a reply-to address
> for my outgoing mail. I am on a standalone computer and use my
> non-existant hostname, but w
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> X-Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via web10806
> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 20:48:05 -0800
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Mailer: Lynx, Version 2.8.3rel.1
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
Hello.. hopefully this gets to someone who can help me. I love using
mutt, but I cannot figure out how to set it to include a reply-to address
for my outgoing mail. I am on a standalone computer and use my
non-existant hostname, but would like a reply-to address to be listed so
people can re
