* JimO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-23 19:43]:
> I don't find a specification for Mutt's threading
> algorithm in the docs I have, manual and faq.
which manual explains algorithms, anyway? ;-)
> Maybe it's a moving target, but I bet it's pretty
> stable at this point. As I understand it, Mutt
>
Hi,
* JimO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-23 21:29]:
>I often need to hack these headers to organize threads where
>correspondents are careless about replying, but their content
>is important enough to keep their mail; I'd like to know what
>spec I should be working to as I hack. Obviously, I can ge
JimO wrote:
> I don't find a specification for Mutt's threading algorithm in the
> docs I have, manual and faq. Maybe it's a moving target, but I bet
> it's pretty stable at this point. As I understand it, Mutt uses
> In-Reply-To as its highest precedence, which makes sense, but I'm left
> with
