Re: send-hook and set

2002-04-04 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * David T-G [04/04/02 21:59:38] wrote: > Rocco, et al -- > ...and then Rocco Rutte said... > % * David T-G [04/04/02 18:48:49] wrote: > % > Contrast this to an fcc-hook or a folder-hook, only one of which can be > % > applied; mutt goes through the list and stops at the first match, so your

Re: send-hook and set

2002-04-04 Thread David T-G
Rocco, et al -- ...and then Rocco Rutte said... % % Hi, Hi! % % * David T-G [04/04/02 18:48:49] wrote: ... % > Contrast this to an fcc-hook or a folder-hook, only one of which can be % > applied; mutt goes through the list and stops at the first match, so your % > default case -- if you even

Re: send-hook and set

2002-04-04 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * David T-G [04/04/02 18:48:49] wrote: > More importantly, multiple send-hooks can be applied to a single message, > so mutt goes through them all applying everything that matches. If you > had > send-hook . set pgp_autosign=yes > send-hook aol.com set pgp_autosign=no > send-hook dad

Re: send-hook and set

2002-04-04 Thread David T-G
Peter -- ...and then Peter T. Abplanalp said... % % i think i know the answer to this but i wanted to make sure... Hey, you have the manual; what more do you need? ;-) % % if i have a send-hook: % % send-hook somelist set pgp_autosign=no % % it changes the value of pgp_autosign from there

Re: send-hook and set

2002-04-04 Thread Will Yardley
Peter T. Abplanalp wrote: > i think i know the answer to this but i wanted to make sure... > > if i have a send-hook: > > send-hook somelist set pgp_autosign=no > > it changes the value of pgp_autosign from there on out, yes? it is not > a temporary item just for this send afterwhich the glob

Re: send-hook and set

2002-04-04 Thread darren chamberlain
* Peter T. Abplanalp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-04 10:51]: > i think i know the answer to this but i wanted to make sure... > > if i have a send-hook: > > send-hook somelist set pgp_autosign=no > > it changes the value of pgp_autosign from there on out, yes? it is > not a temporary item just

Re: send-hook and set

2002-04-04 Thread Dan Boger
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 08:51:31AM -0700, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote: > i think i know the answer to this but i wanted to make sure... > > if i have a send-hook: > > send-hook somelist set pgp_autosign=no > > it changes the value of pgp_autosign from there on out, yes? it is not > a temporary it