On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 04:13:31PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> You should all check out Brian Winters version, which is reportedly rather
> stable and was written from scratch.
IMNSHO you should follow Jeremey's advice. ;) I can tell you from
experience that hacking on their elm.c example unt
Jeremy [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 12:09:23PM +, Matthew Cordes wrote:
>
> > It is not terribly difficulty. Mine bombs however when the mailto
> > includes subject information that mutt appears to not understand, yet
> > netscape's mailer and outlook have no problem
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 12:09:23PM +, Matthew Cordes wrote:
> It is not terribly difficulty. Mine bombs however when the mailto
> includes subject information that mutt appears to not understand, yet
> netscape's mailer and outlook have no problem with. It shouldn't be too
> difficult to ad
It is not terribly difficulty. Mine bombs however when the mailto
includes subject information that mutt appears to not understand, yet
netscape's mailer and outlook have no problem with. It shouldn't be too
difficult to add some mutt specific switches to elm.c before compiling
though. Anyone h
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 04:13:00AM -0700, Leiden, Soren wrote:
> Is it at all possible to use mutt from netscape? i.e. clicking on a
> mailto: spawns mutt properly--would be the main thing...
Yes, but it's non-trivial. I have Netscape set up to spawn Mutt when I
click a mailto link.
You nee
