On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 03:53:35AM +0200, clemensF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> muttered:
> > Mike Markowski:
>
> > Notice that I now must put *two* slashes after "~mm". With only a
> > single slash, I get this:
>
> how in the world did you find out? i would never have had the idea to try
> to put two
> Mike Markowski:
> Notice that I now must put *two* slashes after "~mm". With only a
> single slash, I get this:
how in the world did you find out? i would never have had the idea to try
to put two slashes in there! now tell us: what made you do this? not the
marsians again
clemens
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 12:45:32PM -0400, Mike Markowski wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 05:19:52PM +0200, Thomas Roessler
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> muttered:
> > On 2000-06-21 10:49:57 -0400, Mike Markowski wrote:
> >
> > > Notice that I now must put *two* slashes after "~mm". With only a
> > > si
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 05:19:52PM +0200, Thomas Roessler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> muttered:
> On 2000-06-21 10:49:57 -0400, Mike Markowski wrote:
>
> > Notice that I now must put *two* slashes after "~mm". With only a
> > single slash, I get this:
>
> [...]
>
> > It seems to swallow the first sla
On 2000-06-21 10:49:57 -0400, Mike Markowski wrote:
> Notice that I now must put *two* slashes after "~mm". With only a
> single slash, I get this:
[...]
> It seems to swallow the first slash.
Please try the attached patch.
Index: muttlib.c
=
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 10:13:03AM -0400, Daniel Monjar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> muttered:
> Just grabbed 1.2.2i and did the install. Everything appeared to work
> well but mutt seg faults on invocation.
I'm running on Solaris 8 without imap/ssl and it works without
any noticable problems, except for
On 2000-06-21 10:13:03 -0400, Daniel Monjar wrote:
> Just grabbed 1.2.2i and did the install. Everything
> appeared to work well but mutt seg faults on
> invocation.
Have you recently upgraded your libc?
