On 2000-12-02 10:43:07 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>> Sendmail has been rewriting 8bit to quoted-printable content
>>> for decades, when relaying 8bit mail to 7bit-only relays.
>> First of all, sendmail has of course not done that "from the
>> beginning", since it's considerably older than
On 2000-12-01 07:55:05 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Sendmail has been rewriting 8bit to quoted-printable content for
> decades, when relaying 8bit mail to 7bit-only relays. This
> involves rewriting both the headers and the actual content of the
> MIME section. Of course MTAs are free to rew
Anand Buddhdev proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> Alright. So there's a problem. Maybe courier is wrong is doing what it
> does. Maybe the RFC is ambigious. That still leaves me with the problem of
> sending PGP signed messages which are unverifiable. Does anyone have any
> soltions for me?
Ins
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 02:31:27PM +, David Ellement wrote:
> > Now, this entire MIME body part is encrypted/signed, and eventually
> > put into some more MIME sugar. Here, PGP only ever touches us-ascii
> > text (with which it deals nicely); the actual character set
> > conversions are left
On 2000-11-30 18:32:42 +0100, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> Now I'm not an expert on MIME and PGP, so I don't know who's at
> fault here. The author of the MTA I use (courier) says that MTAs
> are free to rewrite headers as necessary, while obviously it's
> causing a problem for me. I also realise that
On 001130, at 18:32:42, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> Ok. I've done some more digging. After I send a signed message, I can
> verify the fcc copy. However, I can't verify the cc: copy, and also,
> the recipient can't verify the copy he receives. I've traced it down to
> the following:
>
> The boundary
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 11:40:35PM -0800, David Ellement wrote:
[ Background: I was having trouble verifying PGP signatures within mutt. I
thought it might have been a mutt issue, and asked on the mutt list. Now
I think it is a courier issue, hence the Cc: to Sam Varshavchik ]
> Perhaps you woul
On 001127, at 18:15:42, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 04:46:47AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> > : If I send a message with mutt 1.2, and sign it with gpg 1.0.4, and if the
> > : message has no quoted printable encoding, then the recipient, also u
Anand Buddhdev wrote:
: On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 04:46:47AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: > Does you can verify this message?
:
: I cannot verify the message.
:
: > Does your recipient can verify this message?
:
: My recipient cannot verify the message.
:
: > Does you or your recipient use
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 04:46:47AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> : If I send a message with mutt 1.2, and sign it with gpg 1.0.4, and if the
> : message has no quoted printable encoding, then the recipient, also using
> : 1.2 and gpg 1.0.4, can verify the signature.
>
Anand Buddhdev wrote:
: If I send a message with mutt 1.2, and sign it with gpg 1.0.4, and if the
: message has no quoted printable encoding, then the recipient, also using
: 1.2 and gpg 1.0.4, can verify the signature.
:
: However, if I send the same message with quoted-printable encoding turned
11 matches
Mail list logo
