On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 10:40:31AM +0200, Åsmund Skjæveland wrote:
> > im using mutt with pgp 2.6.something,
> > and I get the occasional message that I should upgrade to a newer version
> > of pgp ..
> >
> > What version of PGP is recommened for use with mutt ?
>
> gpg.
No. Handling of the tru
Gerhard den Hollander [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000523 07:06]:
> >> Also pgp doesnt work anymore very nicely.
> > For PGP file, check that file again, the entire PGP format has changed.
>
> Which brinbgs me to my question.
>
> im using mutt with pgp 2.6.s
Hi,
Thanks for your comments.
Things are working okay now as you can see with mutt upgraded.
However, pgp'ing not really.
In 1.0.1i i could encrypt messages the same way as now exept
When it asks for a key id for the adress to send to, i cant
just type the name of the key or push enter to see
> im using mutt with pgp 2.6.something,
> and I get the occasional message that I should upgrade to a newer version
> of pgp ..
>
> What version of PGP is recommened for use with mutt ?
gpg.
--
Åsmund Skjæveland ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
PGP signature
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 10:13:19AM +0200, Gerhard den Hollander wrote:
> * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000523 07:06]:
>
> >> Also pgp doesnt work anymore very nicely.
> > For PGP file, check that file again, the entire PGP format has changed.
>
> Which brinbgs me to my question.
>
> im
* Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000523 07:06]:
>> Also pgp doesnt work anymore very nicely.
> For PGP file, check that file again, the entire PGP format has changed.
Which brinbgs me to my question.
im using mutt with pgp 2.6.something,
and I get the occasional message that I should upgra
Mipam [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Currently i use mutt 1.0.1i
> I upgraded to 1.2 but my config file wasnt liked to much anymore.
> I looked here : http://www.mutt.org/doc/README.UPGRADE-1.2
> to see about changements between the versions but didnt see relevant things
> concerning me. However, th
