Re: masq of hostname

1999-10-26 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Martin Högman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 27 Oct 1999: > Well, thank god for FreshMeat. I'll have a check at qmail and a few others, and > if this still puzzles me, I shall return. :) I looked these up for someone from freshmeat (Daemons/SMTP), but maybe other people on the list may find th

Re: masq of hostname

1999-10-26 Thread Martin Högman
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 10:34:07PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > One suggestion: don't use sendmail, use something else more easily > managed. Point taken. > If you just want smart-host relaying, there are several alternatives, > starting with sSMTP (for links which are up all the time) to qmai

Re: masq of hostname

1999-10-26 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Martin Högman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 26 Oct 1999: > > Of course, the easy thing to do is to configure your local sendmail > > daemon to simply route all mail through the same server that Pine > > would've used, since that is probably the mail hub for your site > > anyway. Simply use th

Re: masq of hostname

1999-10-26 Thread Martin Högman
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 11:24:35AM -0500, David DeSimone wrote: > Does the hostname really exist, or not? If it does, then you should try > to figure out why your DNS server says it doesn't. If it doesn't exist, > then this is of course a correct error. Well, since my last crash, I've been rat

Re: masq of hostname

1999-10-26 Thread David DeSimone
Martin Högman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Whenever I send a message to certain servers, they return the classic > message "hostname unknown" to me. Does the hostname really exist, or not? If it does, then you should try to figure out why your DNS server says it doesn't. If it doesn't exist,