On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Heiko Heil wrote:
> Hello Mutt-users,
> taken from my ~/.muttrc:
> save-hook "~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]|~c [EMAIL PROTECTED]" +tux
> Is it possible to use an logical or operator in order to avoid
> redundancy?
> I didn't succeed with this attempt:
> save-hook "(~t|~c) [EMAIL PR
On 020314, at 13:31:55, Heiko Heil wrote
> taken from my ~/.muttrc:
> save-hook "~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]|~c [EMAIL PROTECTED]" +tux
>
> Is it possible to use an logical or operator in order to avoid
> redundancy?
Assuming you had a number of save hooks using the same set of
operators, you might fin
* Heiko Heil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-14 12:32]:
> taken from my ~/.muttrc:
> save-hook "~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]|~c [EMAIL PROTECTED]" +tux
> Is it possible to use an logical or operator
> in order to avoid redundancy?
> I didn't succeed with this attempt:
> save-hook "(~t|~c) [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
