09-Apr-02 at 09:57, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> % have the same calibre of client as you do, I imagine, since I'm in
> % Morocco. Guru status can be rapidly acheived in a place where real Gurus
> % all left and went to the US years ago ;-)
>
> Hmmm... Good point. Any room for more f
Dave --
...and then Dave Smith said...
%
% On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:55:33AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% > On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > > I telnetted to my imap port and simply got
% [snip]
% > > * OK localhost IMAP4rev1 v12.264 server ready
% > I think
Tim --
...and then Tim Kennedy said...
%
% On Tue, 09 Apr 2002, David T-G wrote:
%
% > incorrect, though. You can write the 'N'ew flag back to your mailbox?
%
% Hi, David.
Hello!
%
% I just tested, and I can indeed write back the new flag to my mailbox.
Hey, cool!
% Both on a Cyrus IMA
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:59:25AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Possibly so. Meanwhile, if you *can* write a 'N'ew flag back to any
> mailbox, I'll start bugging root!
yup, works, no problems :) bug away!
--
Dan Boger
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
msg26931/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:55:33AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> > I telnetted to my imap port and simply got
[snip]
> > * OK localhost IMAP4rev1 v12.264 server ready
> I think that's the WU IMAP implementation...
It looks identic
Dan --
...and then Dan Boger said...
%
% On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > I telnetted to my imap port and simply got
...
% > * OK localhost IMAP4rev1 v12.264 server ready
...
% > incorrect, though. You can write the 'N'ew flag back to your mailbox?
%
% I think t
On Tue, 09 Apr 2002, David T-G wrote:
> so I don't know for sure what IMAP server we're running. It's not worth
> further checking unless my understanding is out of date or otherwise
> incorrect, though. You can write the 'N'ew flag back to your mailbox?
>
Hi, David.
I just tested, and I can
Simon --
...and then Simon White said...
%
% 09-Apr-02 at 09:10, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
% > Heh :-) While I'd love to, I'm usually just the scummy contractor
...
% > enough work to do on the *NIX side, anyway.
%
% I get my own way as a contractor, as much as possible. But then I
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> I telnetted to my imap port and simply got
>
> [zero] [9:39am] ~> telnet localhost 143
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> Connected to localhost.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> * OK localhost IMAP4rev1 v12.264 server ready
> ^]
> tel
09-Apr-02 at 09:10, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Heh :-) While I'd love to, I'm usually just the scummy contractor
> brought in to help clean up the mess, and somehow that never involves
> properly trashing ("replace it with Linux!" "oh, shut up") or even
> properly configuring all of
09-Apr-02 at 09:31, David Collantes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote :
> On 04-09-2002 at 08:56 EDT, Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [...]
> > Set your server to automatically purge Deleted Messages. They won't ever
> > use it to store mail again ;-)
> [...]
>
> How are you accomplishing th
Dan, et al --
...and then Dan Boger said...
%
% On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:27:10AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
...
% > Or am I missing your point?
%
% yes, you are :) why can't you go back and mark a message 'N' again?
It's my understanding that the IMAP design does not allow the client to
write
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:27:10AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:10:17AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % > Same here, and I'm only on mbox :-) I'd probably use IMAP more except
> % > for the bit where I can't go back and mark a message 'N'ew again :-(
> %
> % why not? works
Dan, et al --
...and then Dan Boger said...
%
% On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:10:17AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > Same here, and I'm only on mbox :-) I'd probably use IMAP more except
% > for the bit where I can't go back and mark a message 'N'ew again :-(
%
% why not? works for me... The only
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:10:17AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Same here, and I'm only on mbox :-) I'd probably use IMAP more except
> for the bit where I can't go back and mark a message 'N'ew again :-(
why not? works for me... The only time I wished for a trash box was
when I notied a lot of t
Simon --
...and then Simon White said...
%
% 09-Apr-02 at 08:00, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
...
% > understood the Deleted Messages folder and why some people keep every
% > darned thing in there... It's a real hell for SysAdmins trying to manage
% > disk space!) into some other fold
On 04-09-2002 at 08:56 EDT, Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Set your server to automatically purge Deleted Messages. They won't ever
> use it to store mail again ;-)
[...]
How are you accomplishing this? Is that a special IMAP server? I use IMAP
from Washington University and I d
09-Apr-02 at 08:00, David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Your best bet is probably a trash folder implementation, where you throw
> away messages that you don't really want to throw away (I've never
> understood the Deleted Messages folder and why some people keep every
> darned thing in there.
Van --
...and then VB said...
%
% In MS Outlook, actual deletion from the imap server is a two-step process.
Right; that's IMAP in general.
% Is mutt capable of simulating this behavior; does it retain the "marked for
% deletion" and "purged" distinction? So far, mutt takes my messages off o
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:12:59PM -0800, VB wrote:
> >
> > I perused http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-6.html#commands and I did
> > not see that mutt follows the MS Outlook conventions I described. I saw
> > "mh_purge" is related to "renaming deleted messages," but it's not clear if
> >
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:12:59PM -0800, VB wrote:
>
> I perused http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-6.html#commands and I did
> not see that mutt follows the MS Outlook conventions I described. I saw
> "mh_purge" is related to "renaming deleted messages," but it's not clear if
> this is what
21 matches
Mail list logo
