On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:52:58PM +0200, Morten Brix Pedersen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 10:32:19PM +0200, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
> > Anyone have any thoughts on what might have caused such a change?
>
> It's probably because the mutt defaults on Debian are different, you can
> see the def
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 10:32:19PM +0200, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
> Anyone have any thoughts on what might have caused such a change?
It's probably because the mutt defaults on Debian are different, you can
see the defaults in /etc/Muttrc.
For example I can see these lines on my Debian box:
# do
Hi Jeff,
* Jeff Abrahamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010819 23:12]:
> I was composing, now I don't. (So I set use_from, voila.) And then the
> From: field that I do get is "Jeff Abrahamson " instead of "Jeff
> Abrahamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>". Sendmail rewriting saves my butt on
> outgoing mail, but it
Please wrap your text at < 80 characters per line.
At 02:22 -0500 20 Mar 2001, Matt Kolon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any ideas why I keep getting this: ---|
> |
> Received: (from mkolon@localhost) <--|| <-mutt
> by anxiety.
Horace G. Friend III proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> What baffles me is that I can send to this list. I've set sendmail
> on verbose mode and I can see that outgoing mail is from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and yet the remote system accepts this
> "without a whimper".
Most server operators prefer *
Hi Lars,
Yup it was me alright. :)
I tried to take up your offer of scanning that AHAOFIAH.EXE file
that I suspected of having a virus. I encrypted and signed the
binary and tried to send it to your email address as an
attachment.
What baffles me is that I can send to this list. I've set sendma
> I sent two msgs to two members of Mutt-Users' List (directly to their
> email address) and both msgs were bounced back because of the ff. errors:
So that was you ...
> How can I fix the problem? Before I set ~/.procmailrc everything seems
> fine. Could the error be cause by ~/.procmailrc?
Horace G. Friend III proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> The following addresses had permanent fatal errors
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Reason: 554 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sender address rejected:
> Access denied.)
Put this in sendmail.mc
MASQUERADE_AS(`your-domain.com')
FEATURE(`masqu
> > I think you need to setup masquerading for sendmail as previously
> > suggested but if you want the headers to show glenn@curly and
> > curly.localdomain instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> > localhost.localdomain you could try putting this in /etc/HOSTNAME:
The problem with doing sendmail mas
Hi!
On Sat, Oct 30, 1999 at 12:13:38AM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> I can't think of a good reason to have voyager.localnet. Is localnet
> your loopback network, or a private network? Either way, you should
> probably not use the same hostname for two interfaces on the same
> machine - it's boun
On Friday, 29 October 1999 at 18:16, Bernd Renzing wrote:
> > You might also check /etc/resolv.conf and see if that file has your
> > correct domain in it, too.
> YEP. That was the Problem. I´ve added :
>
> search localnet prima.de
>
> because searches should be first in my localnet, and then ot
> Your message is probably routing through sendmail. Your sendmail.cf
> probably has that string listed as your domain name. Change it.
That have i check dozens of time :-)
> You might also check /etc/resolv.conf and see if that file has your
> correct domain in it, too.
YEP. That was the Probl
On Fri, 29 Oct 1999 12:11:06 -0400, Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Q1: If I want to make sure I get lots of helpful responses to my
> questions, even if they aren't really mutt-related, should I write
> something like
> > Please help me, before i've to use PINE or something like that
>
Bernd Renzing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: Bernd Renzing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> As you see, Mutt appends as domain @voyager.localnet. BUT and here's
> now my Problem: my Hostname in /ETC/HOSTNAME and via SET | more and
> via hostname -f is voyager.prima.de !!!
Your message is probably
The Mutt Users Mailing List FAQ 0.01
Q1: If I want to make sure I get lots of helpful responses to my
questions, even if they aren't really mutt-related, should I write
something like
> Please help me, before i've to use PINE or something like that
at the bottom of my message?
A1: No. Such a r
15 matches
Mail list logo
