On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 11:58:25AM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> Tim Guirgies: I actually saw your mail in webmail first and copy/pasted
> it to test.asc on my local server (where mutt/gpg live) and decrypted it
> manually. Since I already had your key from a previous fetch, all I had to
> do was p
* Arthur Dent [2011-06-12 15:45:59 +0100]:
> -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> OK - I'm trying again - this time from a different email client
> (squirrelmail). This email should be encrypted using you public key. If
> you can decrypt it at least we'll know that
On 12.06.11,10:53, Chris Brennan wrote:
> * Jostein Berntsen [2011-06-12 10:09:38 +0200]:
>
> > You should keep your ~/.mutt/gpg.rc as it is, but remove the "set
> > pgp_good_sign" line above. Keep the other "set pgp_good_sign" line you
> > have. Then add these settings to your ~/.muttrc and tr
* Tim Guirgies [2011-06-12 21:55:28 +1000]:
> Have you yet tried purging all config files? Save them somewhere, and
> try with the stock/default/none config files; see what happens.
Not yet, but it's on my list of things to do. I don't have the time *just*
yet to sit and do that, a few minutes
* Jostein Berntsen [2011-06-12 10:09:38 +0200]:
> You should keep your ~/.mutt/gpg.rc as it is, but remove the "set
> pgp_good_sign" line above. Keep the other "set pgp_good_sign" line you
> have. Then add these settings to your ~/.muttrc and try again:
>
> set pgp_autosign=no set pgp_autoencr
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 02:56:04AM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> So I moved my gpg.rc to a backup and copied yours into place, I was unable
> to even sign mail, all it kept doing was asking for my key, over and over
> again. So I restored my old gpg.rc, still can't actually sign but I can
> at lea
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 08:53:57PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Please can you stop, sending encrypted messages to the list?
Mate, he made one mistake; relax; it's not like he's sending an
encrypted message every five minutes. There's simply no need for that
tone.
Tim
--
() ascii ribbon c
On 12.06.11,02:56, Chris Brennan wrote:
> * Jostein Berntsen [2011-06-12 00:20:47 +0200]:
>
> > On 11.06.11,18:01, Chris Brennan wrote:
> > > * Jostein Berntsen [2011-06-11 23:52:59 +0200]:
> > >
> > > > Can you try to remove this line in your gpg.rc?
> > > >
> > > > set pgp_sign_as=D5B20C0C
* Arthur Dent [2011-06-12 00:54:13 +0100]:
> Hmmm.. Cancel that. This is what I get:
>
> Could not create message.
>
> gpg: using subkey 65AD06FE instead of primary key D5B20C0C
> gpg: 65AD06FE: There is no assurance this key belongs to the named user
> gpg: [stdin]: encryption failed: "
> ", y
* Jostein Berntsen [2011-06-12 00:20:47 +0200]:
> On 11.06.11,18:01, Chris Brennan wrote:
> > * Jostein Berntsen [2011-06-11 23:52:59 +0200]:
> >
> > > Can you try to remove this line in your gpg.rc?
> > >
> > > set pgp_sign_as=D5B20C0C
> >
> > Removed it and I am still unable to sign my mai
On 11.06.11,18:01, Chris Brennan wrote:
> * Jostein Berntsen [2011-06-11 23:52:59 +0200]:
>
> > Can you try to remove this line in your gpg.rc?
> >
> > set pgp_sign_as=D5B20C0C
>
> Removed it and I am still unable to sign my mail, I tried to send mail to
> my self to prevent spamming the list
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 00:33 +0100, Arthur Dent wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 16:25 -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> > * Michelle Konzack [2011-06-11 20:53:57
> > +0200]:
> >
> > > Please can you stop, sending encrypted messages to the list?
> >
> > Michelle,
> > As far as I know, I've only s
* Arthur Dent [2011-06-12 00:33:57 +0100]:
> Chris,
>
> How about this as a test. I will send you a mail encrypted with your key
> (off-list!). See if you can decrypt it?
Sure, go for it.
--
> A: Yes.
> >Q: Are you sure?
> >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >>>Q: Wh
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 16:25 -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> * Michelle Konzack [2011-06-11 20:53:57
> +0200]:
>
> > Please can you stop, sending encrypted messages to the list?
>
> Michelle,
> As far as I know, I've only sent *one* encrypted mail to the list and
> that was the last one I sen
* Jostein Berntsen [2011-06-12 00:16:04 +0200]:
> Could you check your ~/.muttrc settings as well, ref. my last mail?
r...@stewie.xaerolimit.net:~$ grep -e pgp -e gpg .muttrc
78:source ~/.mutt/gpg.rc# YAY! GPG.
ch...@stewie.xaerolimit.net:~$
Nothing to do w/ gpg/pgp in m
On 11.06.11,18:01, Chris Brennan wrote:
> * Jostein Berntsen [2011-06-11 23:52:59 +0200]:
>
> > Can you try to remove this line in your gpg.rc?
> >
> > set pgp_sign_as=D5B20C0C
>
> Removed it and I am still unable to sign my mail, I tried to send mail to
> my self to prevent spamming the list
* Jostein Berntsen [2011-06-11 23:52:59 +0200]:
> Can you try to remove this line in your gpg.rc?
>
> set pgp_sign_as=D5B20C0C
Removed it and I am still unable to sign my mail, I tried to send mail to
my self to prevent spamming the list inapprpropriately. Gpg reports a bad
passphrase. But I
On 11.06.11,17:43, Chris Brennan wrote:
> * Jostein Berntsen [2011-06-11 23:08:39 +0200]:
>
> > Then encryption works, but not pgp signing. These are the pgp variables
> > in my ~/.muttrc that have set a value. The others I have unset. Could
> > you check them with yours?
> >
> >
> > set pgp_
* Jostein Berntsen [2011-06-11 23:08:39 +0200]:
> Then encryption works, but not pgp signing. These are the pgp variables
> in my ~/.muttrc that have set a value. The others I have unset. Could
> you check them with yours?
>
>
> set pgp_autosign=no set pgp_autoencrypt=no
> set pgp_ignore_sub
On 11.06.11,16:37, Chris Brennan wrote:
> * Jostein Berntsen [2011-06-11 22:32:37 +0200]:
>
> > When I try to open your mail I am asked for the PGP passphrasem, so it
> > seems to be working now.
>
> Oh good, at least one part is working, I still get error messages for 'p',
> 's' and 'p', 'a'.
* Jostein Berntsen [2011-06-11 22:32:37 +0200]:
> When I try to open your mail I am asked for the PGP passphrasem, so it
> seems to be working now.
Oh good, at least one part is working, I still get error messages for 'p',
's' and 'p', 'a'. So I dunno why this is working and the other isn't.
On 11.06.11,16:29, Chris Brennan wrote:
> * Jostein Berntsen [2011-06-11 21:01:25 +0200]:
>
> > But, then it seems like it's working now? :)
>
> It did!?! I don't know if it actually worked or not. I do know that when
> I followed the instructions of of 'p' then 'e', I wasn't prompted for my
> p
* Jostein Berntsen [2011-06-11 21:01:25 +0200]:
> But, then it seems like it's working now? :)
It did!?! I don't know if it actually worked or not. I do know that when
I followed the instructions of of 'p' then 'e', I wasn't prompted for my
password for my key, gpg headers were added and the mai
* Michelle Konzack [2011-06-11 20:53:57 +0200]:
> Please can you stop, sending encrypted messages to the list?
Michelle,
As far as I know, I've only sent *one* encrypted mail to the list and
that was the last one I sent with this subject. So I am sorry that the one
piece of encrypted mail I
On 11.06.11,20:53, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Please can you stop, sending encrypted messages to the list?
>
> Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
> Michelle Konzack
>
But, then it seems like it's working now? :)
Jostein
Please can you stop, sending encrypted messages to the list?
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
--
# Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ##
Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux
itsystems@tdnet France
binZGEMtAsf39.bin
Description: application/pgp-encrypted
msg.asc
Description: Binary data
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:34:02AM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> It just seems strange that I can't sign mail but I can use gpg normally
> in any other fashion.
I agree; but I'll bet it's some obscure setting somewhere. A purge and
reinstall will be able to test that theory.
Actually, one other
* Tim Guirgies [2011-06-11 16:33:25 +1000]:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:51:07PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> > I'm out of idea's now ... I still can't sign mail, so I don't know if I have
> > the wrong configuration somewhere or if it's mutt/gpg not talking for some
> > reason. Either way, this
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:51:07PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> I'm out of idea's now ... I still can't sign mail, so I don't know if I have
> the wrong configuration somewhere or if it's mutt/gpg not talking for some
> reason. Either way, this is still unresolved.
Well, do you have another machi
* Chris Brennan [2011-06-06 19:27:03 -0400]:
> * Tim Guirgies [2011-06-07 03:57:37 +1000]:
>
> > > > Can you please tell me the exact sequence you use to try to sign a
> > > > message?
> > >
> > > Compose/reply to a piece of mail, esc:x to save it, I get moved to the
> > > post-reply window.
Hi Chris!
On Di, 07 Jun 2011, Chris Brennan wrote:
> * Christian Brabandt [2011-06-07 17:58:50 +0200]:
>
> > I think, the 'l' flag comes from $VIMRUNTIME/ftplugin/mail.vim
> >
> > In your case, ~/.vim/after/ftplugin/mail.vim just was executed later
> > than the mail.vim from the vim runtime d
* Christian Brabandt [2011-06-07 17:58:50 +0200]:
> I think, the 'l' flag comes from $VIMRUNTIME/ftplugin/mail.vim
>
> In your case, ~/.vim/after/ftplugin/mail.vim just was executed later
> than the mail.vim from the vim runtime directory and happens to also
> change your 'fo' setting, so the
Hi Chris!
On Di, 07 Jun 2011, Chris Brennan wrote:
> * Christian Brabandt [2011-06-07 08:22:51 +0200]:
>
> > The better alternative is to ask vim, when formationoptions was set to
> > include the 'l' flag. So when invoking the mail editor from mutt type
> > :verbose set fo?
> >
> > and vim sh
* Christian Brabandt [2011-06-07 08:22:51 +0200]:
> The better alternative is to ask vim, when formationoptions was set to
> include the 'l' flag. So when invoking the mail editor from mutt type
> :verbose set fo?
>
> and vim should explicitly tell you, where it was last set.
Neat , indeed
Hi Chris!
On Mo, 06 Jun 2011, Chris Brennan wrote:
> ch...@stewie.xaerolimit.net:~$ grep formatoptions .vimrc
> 98: " set formatoptions=rq " Automatically insert comment leader
> on return, and let gq format comments
> ch...@stewie.xaerolimit.net:~$ grep formatoptions .vim/after/ftp
* Tim Guirgies [2011-06-07 03:57:37 +1000]:
> > > Can you please tell me the exact sequence you use to try to sign a
> > > message?
> >
> > Compose/reply to a piece of mail, esc:x to save it, I get moved to the
> > post-reply window. From there 'p', 'a' to Sign As, it asks for my KEY ID,
> Can
* Tim Guirgies [2011-06-07 03:43:45 +1000]:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:31:43PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> > In just VIm, text wraps to my terminal, even when I explistily set the
> > following befor typing.
> >
> > :set wrap
> > :set tw=72
> >
> > vim still blindly ignores textwidth, if I
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:22:42PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> > Well, it can't, actually. I've got it encrypted with gpg, and then in
> > my .muttrc, I have:
> >
> > set imap_pass = `gpg --quiet --decrypt ~/.mutt-password-gmail`
> >
> > Note the backticks. This is for bash, but should work f
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:31:43PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> In just VIm, text wraps to my terminal, even when I explistily set the
> following befor typing.
>
> :set wrap
> :set tw=72
>
> vim still blindly ignores textwidth, if I ditch my overtly long .vimrc,
> vim obeys like a good dog. bu
* Tim Guirgies [2011-06-07 03:17:38 +1000]:
> From ":help fo-table":
> l Long lines are not broken in insert mode: When a line was longer
> than 'textwidth' when the insert command started, Vim does not
> automatically format it.
>
> I'm guessing that you have no problems with auto-wrappin
* Tim Guirgies [2011-06-07 03:03:12 +1000]:
back on list :D
> Thankfully, gpg makes it pretty hard to do stupid things like sending
> out your private key. That block there is a PGP cleartext signature:
> what will appear with all your email once you begin to sign it; it's
> perfectly safe, and
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:16:57PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> n vim (while editoring this email), I see the following
>
> formatoptions=tcqlw
>
> While in straight vim, I see
>
> formatoptions=tcq, So I don't get why vim won't break lines at 72, I'm
> still breaking them manually.
From ":hel
* Tim Guirgies [2011-06-06 19:38:02 +1000]:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 07:22:11PM +1000, Tim Guirgies wrote:
> > I was going to talk about vim too, but probably best if I reply in the
> > other thread.
>
> Interestingly enough, I'm unable to find that other thread, so I'll say
> it here: type ":s
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 07:22:11PM +1000, Tim Guirgies wrote:
> I was going to talk about vim too, but probably best if I reply in the
> other thread.
Interestingly enough, I'm unable to find that other thread, so I'll say
it here: type ":set formatoptions" in vim. You should see something
like "
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 11:25:45PM -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
> yes, it prints 0xMy8CharKey, either way, it still refuses my passord ...
> and damn it all, tw=72 is not being obeyed! Ahh ell, I'll figure that
> out later, signing mail is more important.
I have several stupid questions. First, a
* Brian Ryans [2011-06-05 21:32:03 -0500]:
> Quoting Chris Brennan on 2011-06-04 19:54:
> > I added my 8-charcater key and mutt changes it to a 10-character
> > hexidecimal key.
>
> Are the first two characters of the 10-character key "0x"? If so that's
> just denoting the key's hex and are not
Quoting Chris Brennan on 2011-06-04 19:54:
> I added my 8-charcater key and mutt changes it to a 10-character
> hexidecimal key.
Are the first two characters of the 10-character key "0x"? If so that's
just denoting the key's hex and are not part of the key; I haven't set
it up in quite a long time
* Chris Brennan [2011-06-05 14:54:43 -0400]:
> * Jostein Berntsen [2011-06-05 20:47:04 +0200]:
>
> > You should enter the email address that you have a key for after
> > entering 'p' and 'a' instead for the hex value. You can also try signing
> > with 'p' and 's'.
>
> I will try this and re
>
> I will try this and reply back to the list with my results. Thanks for the
> tip.
Uh... this may sound silly... but is the key being used expired? If it is,
Mutt won't use it if memory serves.
>
> --
> > A: Yes.
> > >Q: Are you sure?
> > >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conv
* Jostein Berntsen [2011-06-05 20:47:04 +0200]:
> You should enter the email address that you have a key for after
> entering 'p' and 'a' instead for the hex value. You can also try signing
> with 'p' and 's'.
I will try this and reply back to the list with my results. Thanks for the
tip.
--
On 05.06.11,14:29, Chris Brennan wrote:
> * Jostein Berntsen [2011-06-05 11:45:54 +0200]:
>
> > When you do "gpg --list-keys" can you see your friend's mail address and
> > your own in the output?
>
> Yes, I can, below is that output, with fudges for name/email
>
> chris@stewie ~ $ gpg --list-
* Jostein Berntsen [2011-06-05 11:45:54 +0200]:
> When you do "gpg --list-keys" can you see your friend's mail address and
> your own in the output?
Yes, I can, below is that output, with fudges for name/email
chris@stewie ~ $ gpg --list-keys
/home/chris/.gnupg/pubring.gpg
On 04.06.11,20:54, Chris Brennan wrote:
> A friend of mine shared his gpg key with me and showed me some of the basics
> to using gpg, I uncommented the source line in my .muttrc to start using it
> and when I get to the post-compose/confirmation window where I can add
> attachments, I figured o
54 matches
Mail list logo
