Re: format=flowed (was: If List Reply Fails, Fall Back to Group Reply or Reply)

2015-09-08 Thread Chris Bannister
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 12:31:58AM -0400, Grady Martin wrote: > On 2015年09月07日 13時39分, Cameron Simpson wrote: > >Hmm. I was going to complain about your reflow_* > >settings (even though the defaults are to reflow > >at 78 columns), but I see that they are not > >properly obeyed for me either. Grad

Re: format=flowed (was: If List Reply Fails, Fall Back to Group Reply or Reply)

2015-09-07 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 07Sep2015 00:31, Grady Martin wrote: On 2015年09月07日 13時39分, Cameron Simpson wrote: Hmm. I was going to complain about your reflow_* settings (even though the defaults are to reflow at 78 columns), but I see that they are not properly obeyed for me either. Grady's message wraps at my terminal

Re: format=flowed (was: If List Reply Fails, Fall Back to Group Reply or Reply)

2015-09-07 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Grady Martin [09-07-15 21:38]: > On 2015年09月07日 07時59分, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > >When so doubt or question exists, there is always that ancient document, > >man pages. > > > >re: wrap > > set wrap=78 > > set smart_wrap > > set reflow_wrap > > > >Nothing weird except habit :) > > Very true. I

Re: format=flowed (was: If List Reply Fails, Fall Back to Group Reply or Reply)

2015-09-07 Thread Grady Martin
On 2015年09月07日 07時59分, Patrick Shanahan wrote: When so doubt or question exists, there is always that ancient document, man pages. re: wrap set wrap=78 set smart_wrap set reflow_wrap Nothing weird except habit :) Very true. I had neglected to set wrap. With these settings, though, how w

Re: format=flowed (was: If List Reply Fails, Fall Back to Group Reply or Reply)

2015-09-07 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Cameron Simpson [09-06-15 23:51]: > On 06Sep2015 22:54, Patrick Shanahan wrote: [...] > >Most certainly, longer lines than 80 chars. > > Hmm. I was going to complain about your reflow_* settings (even though the > defaults are to reflow at 78 columns), but I see that they are not properly > o

Re: format=flowed (was: If List Reply Fails, Fall Back to Group Reply or Reply)

2015-09-06 Thread Grady Martin
On 2015年09月07日 13時39分, Cameron Simpson wrote: Hmm. I was going to complain about your reflow_* settings (even though the defaults are to reflow at 78 columns), but I see that they are not properly obeyed for me either. Grady's message wraps at my terminal width, even though I have just set reflow

Re: format=flowed (was: If List Reply Fails, Fall Back to Group Reply or Reply)

2015-09-06 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On 2015-09-07 13:39 +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: > Hmm. I was going to complain about your reflow_* settings (even > though the defaults are to reflow at 78 columns), but I see that they > are not properly obeyed for me either. Grady's message wraps at my > terminal width, even though I have just

Re: format=flowed (was: If List Reply Fails, Fall Back to Group Reply or Reply)

2015-09-06 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 06Sep2015 22:54, Patrick Shanahan wrote: * Cameron Simpson [09-06-15 22:41]: On 06Sep2015 21:38, Patrick Shanahan wrote: >* Grady Martin [09-06-15 21:32]: >>Hello, fellow puppies. The mutt mailing list is magical. Executing a >>regular results in a prompt that confirms the recipient (l

Re: format=flowed (was: If List Reply Fails, Fall Back to Group Reply or Reply)

2015-09-06 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Cameron Simpson [09-06-15 22:41]: > On 06Sep2015 21:38, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > >* Grady Martin [09-06-15 21:32]: > >>Hello, fellow puppies. The mutt mailing list is magical. Executing a > >>regular results in a prompt that confirms the recipient (list or > >>sender). > [...] > > > >line