Heinrich --
...and then Heinrich Langos said...
% On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:22:58PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > ...and then Heinrich Langos said...
% > %
% > % often i get mails that i would like to be reminded of later.
...
% > % and is lost between tons of more or less important stuff.
% >
%
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:16:58PM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
> could mutt ask me for input while running a macro ?
> like this:
> i press my remind-key and mutt askes me for input (e.g. the time i
> want to be reminded of that message) and then pipes the mail to an
> external programm putting
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:16:58PM +0100 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Heinrich Langos thought:
>
> so the question that remains is: how do i prompt a user in mutt
> for input and use that input in the macro?
>
Best I've done is to use xmessage and get the return from the buttons
pressed but
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:22:58PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Heinrich --
>
> ...and then Heinrich Langos said...
> % hi
> %
> % often i get mails that i would like to be reminded of later.
> % like i get a mail from my girlfriend in the morning that i should
> % fetch something on the way home i
Heinrich --
...and then Heinrich Langos said...
% hi
%
% often i get mails that i would like to be reminded of later.
% like i get a mail from my girlfriend in the morning that i should
% fetch something on the way home in the evening.
% but in the evening that mail has been scrolled way off th
On 2000-12-18 14:25:41 +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 01:38:15PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
>> One thing you could do is to use the "important" flag and try
>> to get a habit of looking at the flagged messages from time to
>> time.
> that would mean that all falagged
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 07:29:42PM +0530, Sankaranarayanan K V wrote:
> I use mutt in combination with procmail and xbuffy.
>
> If I need to remind myself of a mail, I flag that message as new and
> save it in a special folder -- done with a macro. Rest is taken care by
> xbuffy. Further, xbuff
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 10:46:14AM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
> and an internal mutt solution (like in a special follow-up-folder)
> would be nicer anyway since you could still access that mails whenever
> you liked to.
I use mutt in combination with procmail and xbuffy.
If I need to remind
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 06:34:45PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>
> Wouldn't procmailing mails from your girlfriend, your co-workers etc etc into
> separate folders help? ;)
not realy ... since i wouldn't reread old mail if not reminded.
not even mail from my girl :-)
> What you ar
Hi,
On 00-12-18, Heinrich Langos wrote:
>is there a way in mutt to get reminded of that mail later or does
>anybody know a local mail bouncer daemon that delays delivery for
>a (by header or subject) configurable time ?
You could tell Procmail to put out an at(1) job.
Or make a makro to do this i
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 01:38:15PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> One thing you could do is to use the "important" flag and try to get
> a habit of looking at the flagged messages from time to time.
that would mean that all falagged messages would show up all the time..
> You could even write
Heinrich Langos proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> like i get a mail from my girlfriend in the morning that i should
> fetch something on the way home in the evening.
> but in the evening that mail has been scrolled way off the screen
> and is lost between tons of more or less important stuff.
One thing you could do is to use the "important" flag and try to get
a habit of looking at the flagged messages from time to time.
You could even write a little shell script which basically greps for
"X-Status:.*F", and regularly reminds you that you have important
mail sitting in your inbox.
13 matches
Mail list logo
