* Sascha Huedepohl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > but rather than rewriting all messages -
> > how about using mutt's reverse_alias feature?
>
> ah - cool feature.
> I testet it but it seems to only "convert" the first
> occurence of the "f
Hi,
* David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> % | formail -I "From: Real Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> %
> % i think this should work !?
>
> Yes. Now you have one rule like that for every user to modify. If you
> prefer that over a side script with all of that logic that will keep
> your procmai
Hi,
* Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> but rather than rewriting all messages -
> how about using mutt's reverse_alias feature?
ah - cool feature.
I testet it but it seems to only "convert" the first
occurence of the "friend" in the index.
After i "unset reverse_alias" in my .muttrc
Sascha --
...and then Sascha Huedepohl said...
%
% Hi David,
Hello!
%
...
%
% :0 wf
% * From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
% | formail -I "From: Real Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
%
% i think this should work !?
Yes. Now you have one rule like that for every user to modify. If you
prefer that over a s
Hi David,
* David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> %
> % No i would like to set up a little procmail rule
> % to replace the From: header with a correct one.
>
> It should be easy enough to have a rule something like
>
> :0 f
> * From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | /path/to/some_clever_script
w
Sascha --
...and then Sascha Huedepohl said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
% some friends of mine are not able to or not
% willing to configure their eMail Software
% in that way that the From: Header is set to:
% Realname or email@address (Realname)
They must not be True Friends then :-)
% And i hate
* Eduardo Gargiulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-20 02:55]:
> another question: is it possible that if i run
> mutt with -f option, the folder-hooks don't work?
could be. start a new thread, ok?
Sven
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 06:32:04AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
>
> I'm running 1.2.5. I find that whether folder-hooks work with -f
> depends on how the file name is given on the command line. For example,
> folder-hooks work for these:
>
> mutt -f =Incoming/mutt-users
> mutt -f ~/Mail/
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 06:37:45AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Eduardo --
>
> ...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
> %
> % another question: is it possible that if i run mutt with -f option, the
> % folder-hooks don't work?
>
> Theoretically anything is possible :-) Practically, though, folder-h
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% another question: is it possible that if i run mutt with -f option, the
% folder-hooks don't work?
Theoretically anything is possible :-) Practically, though, folder-hooks
work just fine with -f; I do that all the time (in fact, I almost neve
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 10:00:00AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
>
> % folder-hook ~/users/qmail/. my_hdr From: qmail user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> % folder-hook ~/users/qmail/. set hostname="ar.homelinux.org"
>
> Leave off the /. on the end and you might even try it without the ~/ on
> the front. Somet
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 10:00:00AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% >
% > folder-hook users/qmail 'set hostname=ar.homelinux.org ; my_hdr ...'
...
%
% thanks, it really work! Look at my headers, i have not set QMAILINJECT,
Yay! :-)
% so there i
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 10:00:00AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Leave off the /. on the end and you might even try it without the ~/ on
> the front. Something like
>
> folder-hook users/qmail 'set hostname=ar.homelinux.org ; my_hdr ...'
>
> should work.
thanks, it really work! Look at my header
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% Hi all.
Hello!
%
% I want to user muttrc file to set my From: and Reply-To headers based
% on the maildir i'm reading. I'm using vmailmgr, so i have several
Piece of cake.
% virtual users maildirs under ~/users/ dir. Now i have a shell s
14 matches
Mail list logo
