* Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [17-10-2002 17:36]:
> > Apart from what would be the use of this, you shouldn't "exec" the
> > macro (because exec applies to functions only, as the error message
> > says), but you should "push" the key sequence.
> >
> ... quote from manual - "``exec function''
* Susan Kleinmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [17-10-2002 17:08]:
> I am trying to figure out how to get mutt to execute some command specified
> on the command line and then quit. This first effort is just to get mutt to
> provide an index listing of new messages in a folder and then quit.
> To do that,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 05:10:17PM +0200, Ren? Clerc wrote:
> * Susan Kleinmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [17-10-2002 17:08]:
>
> > I am trying to figure out how to get mutt to execute some command specified
> > on the command line and then quit. This first effort is just to get mutt to
> > provide an
Susan Kleinmann wrote:
> To do that, I defined the following macro in my muttrc:
>
> macro index ,n "~N\n\n"
>
> Then I invoked mutt with the command:
>
> mutt -e "exec ,n"
>
> This produces the message:
> ,n: no such function
> Error in command line:
> Press any key to continue...
>
> What a
* vdaelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-12 12:40]:
> -
> #!/bin/sh
>
> for i in `cat listaMail`
> do
> mutt -s "All'attenzione del signore $i" $i <
> /home/info/mails/mail.html
> done
> -
>
> The only problem is that mutt always send the mail with a content
vdaelli wrote:
> The only problem is that mutt always send the mail with a content-type:
> text/plain, while we would like to send a content-type: text/html.
> So the receiver sees the source HTML.
> Is there a way to override this default setting and let us send a
> personalized content-type?
Th
Sitting at the campfire, Kai Blin told:
> Hi folks.
>
> when I send mails using mutts "batch" mode, is there a way to split the
> lines so they fit to screen?
> I tried a script to enter a \n but that simply made a foo\nbat instead of
> foo
> bar
Problem resolved. It was an echo -e "foo\nbar" so
