Hi Mutt!
On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Sean Rima wrote:
> Hi Steve!
>
> On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Steve Kennedy wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 05:16:03PM -0800, Russell Van Tassell wrote:
> >
> > > Well, quite honestly, I've "disappeared" from the list because of an
> > > overloaded mail server or mi
Hi Steve!
On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Steve Kennedy wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 05:16:03PM -0800, Russell Van Tassell wrote:
>
> > Well, quite honestly, I've "disappeared" from the list because of an
> > overloaded mail server or mis-behaving/looping upstream relay (there's
> > been a couple of w
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 05:16:03PM -0800, Russell Van Tassell wrote:
> Well, quite honestly, I've "disappeared" from the list because of an
> overloaded mail server or mis-behaving/looping upstream relay (there's
> been a couple of weird ones that, all told, lasted an hour or two)...
> so I think
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 09:33:56PM +, Sean Rima wrote:
> > > [Did 'vacation' cause me to get bounced off the list?]
> >
> > Ummm... simply put, use procmail/formail... you'll have less problems
> > with it. (there are decent examples of making this work in the
> > procmailex man page)
>
> Th
Hi Shane!
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Shane Castle wrote:
> >Seriously OT but maybe not. I went on holiday and left vacation to answer my
> >mail, however, it should not send any mail back to the list.
> >
> >I was unsubscribed from the list and I wanted to know if my vacation sent an
> >auto-respond m
Hi Russell!
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Russell Van Tassell wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 01:25:52PM +, Sean Rima wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > Seriously OT but maybe not. I went on holiday and left vacation to answer my
> > mail, however, it should not send any mail back to the list.
>
> Ummm.
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 01:25:52PM +, Sean Rima wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Seriously OT but maybe not. I went on holiday and left vacation to answer my
> mail, however, it should not send any mail back to the list.
Ummm... simply put, use procmail/formail... you'll have less problems
with it. (
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999, Shane Castle wrote:
> It serves absolutely no useful purpose and causes
> more problems that anything it was intended to solve. PLEASE don't use
> it! Don't even try to fix it; it's too broken!
Which version are you talking about?
IMHO it is a very useful program, ther
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Sean Rima wrote:
>Seriously OT but maybe not. I went on holiday and left vacation to answer my
>mail, however, it should not send any mail back to the list.
>
>I was unsubscribed from the list and I wanted to know if my vacation sent an
>auto-respond message.
>
>I only ask as
