Re: Tagging mail by date

* Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 08:38]: [...] > Or even better does anyone have any sample scripts using mutt as the > 'source' for archiving mail? I've been looking at archmbox but it > doesn't quite fit my requirements and I suspect that using mutt to > actually extract the messag

Re: Tagging mail by date

* Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 08:38]: [...] > Or even better does anyone have any sample scripts using mutt as the > 'source' for archiving mail? I've been looking at archmbox but it > doesn't quite fit my requirements and I suspect that using mutt to > actually extract the messag

Re: Tagging mail by date

* Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 08:38]: [...] > Or even better does anyone have any sample scripts using mutt as the > 'source' for archiving mail? I've been looking at archmbox but it > doesn't quite fit my requirements and I suspect that using mutt to > actually extract the messag

Re: Tagging mail by date

Hi Chris! On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Chris Green wrote: > I've looked at the documentation Sure? > and I know it's possible but does anyone have any examples of > tagging mail by date? Have a look at: > I.e. how do I tag all messages more than (say) 365

Re: Tagging mail by date -> pattern ~d

* Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 13:25]: > I've looked at the documentation and I know it's possible > but does anyone have any examples of tagging mail by date? > I.e. how do I tag all messages more than > (say) 365 days old in the current mailbox? ~d<1y"date is less than one

Re: Tagging mail by date

* Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 09:25]: > I.e. how do I tag all messages more than (say) 365 days old in the > current mailbox? ~d >365d (darren) -- Competence, like truth, beauty, and contact lenses, is in the eye of the beholder. -- Dr. Laurence J. Peter