Re: Status flags in 1.1.1

1999-11-23 Thread Stefan `Sec` Zehl
On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 06:07:25PM -0500, Jeremy wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 01:08:50PM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote: > > * Jeremy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [991121 08:46]: > >> I just upgraded to 1.1.1. Previously, if a mail contained attachments > >> (which require mailcap to view) they would have a

Re: Status flags in 1.1.1

1999-11-23 Thread Jeremy
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 01:08:50PM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Jeremy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [991121 08:46]: > >> I just upgraded to 1.1.1. Previously, if a mail contained attachments >> (which require mailcap to view) they would have an M next to them in >> the index, with the status flags. They

Re: Status flags in 1.1.1

1999-11-22 Thread Sven Guckes
* Jeremy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [991121 08:46]: > I just upgraded to 1.1.1. Previously, if a mail contained attachments > (which require mailcap to view) they would have an M next to them in > the index, with the status flags. They don't anymore. Is this a bug? Feature. > It's still in the docum